1986
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(86)90331-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical justification of the magnetic phase diagram of CuMn alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These mixed or randomly canted structures with averaged canting angle of 51 were proposed by Tsunoda and Nakai [31]. Using a parameter fitted random Heisenberg model Chowdhury et al [32] showed that a mean-field description of the phase diagram reproduced most aspects of the experimental data of the work of Gibbs et al [13]. The unsatisfactory part of that work was the fitting of the values for the pair energies and the assumption that these were independent of the alloy composition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These mixed or randomly canted structures with averaged canting angle of 51 were proposed by Tsunoda and Nakai [31]. Using a parameter fitted random Heisenberg model Chowdhury et al [32] showed that a mean-field description of the phase diagram reproduced most aspects of the experimental data of the work of Gibbs et al [13]. The unsatisfactory part of that work was the fitting of the values for the pair energies and the assumption that these were independent of the alloy composition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Alloys of (Cu, γMn)-phase demonstrate magnetic properties that essentially depend on concentration, temperature, and heat treatment regime [4,[26][27][28]. In [14] a magnetic phase diagram of (Cu, γMn) is presented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%