1980
DOI: 10.1002/9780470142608.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of Inhomogeneous Electron Systems: Spin‐Density‐Functional Formalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density functional theory (March et al, 1983;Rajagopal, 1980) was used (Orlov & Fortov, 2001) to carry out comparative analysis of the Thomas-Fermi model (TF) (Feynman et al, 1949), the Hartree-Fock-Slater model (HFS) (Rozsnyai, 1972;Nikiforov & Uvarov, 1973), the Detail Configuration Accounting (DCA) (Rozsnyai, 1982), the Ion Model (IM) (Orlov, 1997), and a brief review of the models is available (Orlov, 2002). The density functional theory (March et al, 1983;Rajagopal, 1980) was used (Orlov & Fortov, 2001) to carry out comparative analysis of the Thomas-Fermi model (TF) (Feynman et al, 1949), the Hartree-Fock-Slater model (HFS) (Rozsnyai, 1972;Nikiforov & Uvarov, 1973), the Detail Configuration Accounting (DCA) (Rozsnyai, 1982), the Ion Model (IM) (Orlov, 1997), and a brief review of the models is available (Orlov, 2002).…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density functional theory (March et al, 1983;Rajagopal, 1980) was used (Orlov & Fortov, 2001) to carry out comparative analysis of the Thomas-Fermi model (TF) (Feynman et al, 1949), the Hartree-Fock-Slater model (HFS) (Rozsnyai, 1972;Nikiforov & Uvarov, 1973), the Detail Configuration Accounting (DCA) (Rozsnyai, 1982), the Ion Model (IM) (Orlov, 1997), and a brief review of the models is available (Orlov, 2002). The density functional theory (March et al, 1983;Rajagopal, 1980) was used (Orlov & Fortov, 2001) to carry out comparative analysis of the Thomas-Fermi model (TF) (Feynman et al, 1949), the Hartree-Fock-Slater model (HFS) (Rozsnyai, 1972;Nikiforov & Uvarov, 1973), the Detail Configuration Accounting (DCA) (Rozsnyai, 1982), the Ion Model (IM) (Orlov, 1997), and a brief review of the models is available (Orlov, 2002).…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, for a given ion, for each relativistic configuration, we solve a Dirac equation for each occupied level which gives us its relativistic mono-electronic wave function, and the corresponding energy level. The total energy is then obtained using a density-functional formalism (Rajagopal, 1980;Kohn & Sham, 1965) assuming the local density approach for the exchange and correlation energy. The effective potential used in the Dirac equation is anyone of the analytical central ones developed by our group.…”
Section: Atomic Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also performed Dirac scattered wave (DSW) vectorial calculations to estimate spin−orbit effects and spin-dependent properties. In this formalism, an effective Coulomb and exchange−correlation potential approximate the Dirac four-component wave function as a Slater determinant. The exchange−correlation potential is modeled by a relativistic local density potential according to MacDonald and Vosko. For the calculation of the Zeeman magnetic splittings we start with a Dirac self-consistent four-component wave function Φ, and we employ a first-order perturbation procedure. The effects of an external magnetic field is described by a relativistic perturbation Hamiltonian H 1 = e α· A , where α is the 4 × 4 Dirac matrix composed of zeros on the diagonal and the Pauli spin matrices in the off-diagonal positions, and A is the electromagnetic four-vector potential.…”
Section: Details Of the Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%