2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001ja000053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of type II radio emission from the foreshock of an interplanetary shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
148
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, these observations suggest that type II emission is generated in multiple foreshock regions upstream of IP shocks. Theoretical models of electron reflection from the surface of interplanetary shocks are consistent with this model, producing electron beams and plasma radiation at f p and 2f p , which agree reasonably well with the observed quantities (Knock et al 2001Cairns et al 2003). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Taken together, these observations suggest that type II emission is generated in multiple foreshock regions upstream of IP shocks. Theoretical models of electron reflection from the surface of interplanetary shocks are consistent with this model, producing electron beams and plasma radiation at f p and 2f p , which agree reasonably well with the observed quantities (Knock et al 2001Cairns et al 2003). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This is based on calibrating against our combined models for QTN and the galactic background for the Wind WAVES receivers. This combined model can now be used to compare observations in detail with theoretical predictions for type II bursts [Knock et al, 2001;Florens et al, 2007] and type III bursts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest are observations of radio events that follow solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Type II solar radio bursts, for example, are associated with radio emission produced near the local plasma frequency (f p ) and its harmonic (2f p ) upstream of a traveling shock wave, itself often driven ahead of a CME [Wild et al, 1963;Cane et al, 1981Cane et al, , 1987Reiner et al, 1998;Bale et al, 1999;Knock et al, 2001].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bale et al [1999] studied the source region of that type II radio burst, using electron data measured on board Wind; from these observations, they could infer some large-scale shock structure in the source region upstream of the shock. Knock et al [2001] applied and refined the stochastic growth theory (SGT) to that type II burst, to interpret the flux densities they deduced from the dynamic spectrum of data observed by Reiner [2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because our 128-s frequency swept receiver can measure one frequency only at a given time (on a 2-s step), it may miss an event occurring at a specific frequency within the sweep, namely f p , while scanning other frequencies, the exact start time at which the s/c detects the Langmuir waves may be estimated to be between 42 and 42 + 128 = 170 s before 0035:55 UT. At that time (of first detection of Langmuir waves), Ulysses enters the upstream boundary of the electron foreshock, where the solar wind electrons accelerated by the shock drive Langmuir waves at the upstream plasma frequency f pu [e.g., Filbert and Kellogg, 1979;Lacombe et al, 1988]; some of their energy is subsequently mode converted to the type II radio emission observed [Knock et al, 2001, and references therein].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%