Proceedings of Sixth Annual Conference on Large Hadron Collider Physics — PoS(LHCP2018) 2018
DOI: 10.22323/1.321.0304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory vision

Abstract: Particle physics is sometimes described as going through a crisis, notably because of the continued lack of discovery of physics beyond the Standard Model, despite the LHC having operated at close to maximal energy for some years now. Here, I argue that we should not underestimate the significance of recent progress and future prospects in the Higgs sector of the Standard Model. This is especially the case for the Yukawa interactions and the structure of the Higgs potential, both of which are unlike any sector… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we show naive extrapolations of our limits to 300 fb −1 and 3 ab −1 of integrated luminosity (assuming either 13 and 14 TeV collisions), corresponding approximately to the end of the regular LHC operations and the ultimate end of the HL-LHC runs, respectively. Our methodology is the same as [28] (we thank A. Weiler for some clarifications in this regard). We assume that the signal cross section is controlled by a single mass scale m, and that signal efficiencies and background counts remain constant as the integrated luminosity L and/or center-of-mass (CM) energy √ s are increased.…”
Section: Summary Of Results and Further Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, we show naive extrapolations of our limits to 300 fb −1 and 3 ab −1 of integrated luminosity (assuming either 13 and 14 TeV collisions), corresponding approximately to the end of the regular LHC operations and the ultimate end of the HL-LHC runs, respectively. Our methodology is the same as [28] (we thank A. Weiler for some clarifications in this regard). We assume that the signal cross section is controlled by a single mass scale m, and that signal efficiencies and background counts remain constant as the integrated luminosity L and/or center-of-mass (CM) energy √ s are increased.…”
Section: Summary Of Results and Further Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The green line is the projected improvement for limit which currently excluded a 100 GeV particle, the red line assumes a 200 GeV present limit, and the blue line assumes 500 GeV. The projection technique is as described in the text and [28]. Note the transition from linear to log scale at 300 fb −1 .…”
Section: Summary Of Results and Further Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In doing so, at a given lifetime we shift the Run-1 value of the 95% CL reach for the wino mass to the higher value at which the wino cross-section times luminosity (13,300 and 3000 fb −1 ) at the 13-TeV LHC coincides with the reach achieved during Run-1. This method is often used and is known to give a reasonable estimate [51]. We find that the disappearing-track search is more sensitive in the µ > 0 case than in the µ < 0 case because, in order to accommodate the reduced 0.0 0.5 Figure 19.…”
Section: Discovery Prospects At the Lhc And Fcc-hhmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…is kinematically open. Finally, one can establish a rough estimate on the future mass reach at LHC using the ColliderReach tool for extrapolations [88]. We find that by Run 3, with 300 fb −1 , this value should rise to about 5 TeV.…”
Section: E Direct Searches At Lhcmentioning
confidence: 91%