2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00080-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal and mechanical characteristics of poly(l-lactic acid) nanocomposite scaffold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
134
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
13
134
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is inferred that if better interactions between the phase are achieved, an increase in T g could be expected due to the diminution of flexibility and motility of the polymer chains, their intermolecular interactions with the ORMOGLASS, and the steric effect applied by the ORMOGLASS. 45 It is thus believed that T g remained quasi-unchanged, not only because the fibers are a class-I hybrid material, but also because the phases are not homogeneously blended. Even though considered as not significant, the very slight decreases of T g observed after incorporation of the ORMOGLASS may suggest that the presence of the ORMOGLASS however affected T g to a very low extent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is inferred that if better interactions between the phase are achieved, an increase in T g could be expected due to the diminution of flexibility and motility of the polymer chains, their intermolecular interactions with the ORMOGLASS, and the steric effect applied by the ORMOGLASS. 45 It is thus believed that T g remained quasi-unchanged, not only because the fibers are a class-I hybrid material, but also because the phases are not homogeneously blended. Even though considered as not significant, the very slight decreases of T g observed after incorporation of the ORMOGLASS may suggest that the presence of the ORMOGLASS however affected T g to a very low extent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggested that the incorporation of PLLA in higher quantities resulted in the increase in the crystallinity of the scaffolds. [29,30] The peak at 18.5° 2θ was present in all the scaffolds. The d-spacing, crystallite size (D), and lattice strain (Table 2) were calculated using the peak details at 18.5° 2θ.…”
Section: Mechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is well documented that the properties of porous BioPUs can be improved by introducing nanoparticles or nanoclay into the PU matrix. The addition of nanoparticles into the PU matrix can slow down a steep reduction in mechanical properties during biodegradation [223,224]. Thus, the moduli of PU nanocomposites increase from 3 to 7 MPa (133 %) and epoxy nanocomposites from 1.1 to 2.3 GPa (109 %) by the addition of 2-8 wt.…”
Section: Biopu-based Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the storage modulus of PLA/layered silicate nanocomposites is increased from 1.63 to 2.32 GPa (42 %), and the biodegradation rate of the obtained nanocomposite is significantly accelerated in comparison to pristine polymer in terms of the weight loss and molecular weight [227]. Also, incorporation of small amounts of MMT into PLLA can increase the mechanical stiffness of PLLA porous scaffolds [224]. However, the possible toxicity of nanoparticles and other nanocomponents including carbon nanotubes and metal nanoparticles (such as Ag and Au nanoparticles) should be mentioned [228,229].…”
Section: Biopu-based Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%