Advanced Computational Nanomechanics 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781119068921.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Boundary Resistance Effects in Carbon Nanotube Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(122 reference statements)
3
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[55] for a graphene/SiO2 interface, but lower than others [56,58,59]. Values similar to ours have also been reported for the carbon nanotube (CNT)/SiO2 interface [60] and for the graphene/oil interface [61]. The thermal boundary resistance values for other carbon compounds like diamond [63], metallic single-wall CNTs [64] and graphite [10,65] are close to the upper bound of thermal resistances found for graphene, i.e.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Results For The Monolayer Supported By Diffe...supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[55] for a graphene/SiO2 interface, but lower than others [56,58,59]. Values similar to ours have also been reported for the carbon nanotube (CNT)/SiO2 interface [60] and for the graphene/oil interface [61]. The thermal boundary resistance values for other carbon compounds like diamond [63], metallic single-wall CNTs [64] and graphite [10,65] are close to the upper bound of thermal resistances found for graphene, i.e.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Results For The Monolayer Supported By Diffe...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Nevertheless, we can notice that the order of magnitude of r eff is in the realistic range for the thermal boundary resistances 57 and that the obtained value is very close to the range reported by ref 55 for a graphene/SiO 2 interface, but lower than others. 56,58,59 Values similar to ours have also been reported for the carbon nanotube (CNT)/SiO 2 interface 60 and for the graphene/oil interface. 61 The thermal boundary resistance values for other carbon compounds like diamond, 63 metallic single-wall CNTs, 64 and graphite 10,65 are close to the upper bound of thermal resistances found for graphene, that is, of the order of 10 –8 K m 2 /W.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In composites, the poor rectification can be ascribed to the thermal resistance at the interfaces. For instance, the calculated resistance at the interface between octane and single-layer graphene sheets (GS, which shows extremely high values of thermal conductivity, i.e., 3000–5000 Wm −1 k −1 [ 63 ]), has been reported to be 10 times smaller when the alkane chains are covalently bonded at the edges of these GSs [ 64 ]. Pal and Puri found higher rectification using a single-wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) covalently bonded near one end to polyacetylene (PA) chains [ 65 ].…”
Section: Effect Of Thermal Properties Of Polymer Composites On Crystallization and Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the presence of particles or fibers with thermal conductivity much higher than polymers and, usually, lower thermal capacities, affects considerably the solidification of composites. For instance, carbon nanotubes (CNT) even at low concentration can enhance the thermal conductivity of a polymer matrix at least of an order of magnitude [ 64 ]. As a result, composites usually show a finer spherulitic structure than the corresponding matrices, especially at high undercooling [ 66 ].…”
Section: Effect Of Thermal Properties Of Polymer Composites On Crystallization and Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation