2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal–chemical–mechanical gun bore erosion of an advanced artillery system part one: theories and mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Field observations as well as laboratory test results indicate that the typical failure mode of such coating-substrate systems often is a two stage process:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Field observations as well as laboratory test results indicate that the typical failure mode of such coating-substrate systems often is a two stage process:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They think this is because there is hydrogen cracking in the actual ablation. Sopok [4] believes that the hydrogenation process is that the diffusion of hydrogen in the gun steel reduces the strength and toughness of the steel, and increases the risk of cracking and brittle failure. When hydrogen is absorbed through the unoxidized crack surface, the surface energy required for crack propagation is reduced.…”
Section: Chemical Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High flame temperature of propellants may produce combustion gasses at temperatures as high as 3700 K. Peak gas pressure may reach up to 700 MPa. The peak bore temperature of a gun may reach up to 1800 K a few milliseconds after it is fired [1,2]. The firing process has a very strong dynamic effect on the weapon parts: most directly on the barrel, but also on the other weapon parts like the breechblock parts, the breech piece, and the recoil mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%