2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3825-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal constraints on foraging of tropical canopy ants

Abstract: Small cursorial ectotherms risk overheating when foraging in the tropical forest canopy, where the surfaces of unshaded tree branches commonly exceed 50 °C. We quantified the heating and subsequent cooling rates of 11 common canopy ant species from Panama and tested the hypothesis that ant workers stop foraging at temperatures consistent with the prevention of overheating. We created hot experimental "sunflecks" on existing foraging trails of four ant species from different clades and spanning a broad range of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vials were randomly arranged in a tray and placed into a drying oven (Lab Line Model 100) at 50°C (a temperature commonly experienced by tropical ants within the boundary layer on unshaded branches: Spicer et al. ) for 70 min. We removed vials at 10‐min intervals to check for ant mortality before placing them back into the oven.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vials were randomly arranged in a tray and placed into a drying oven (Lab Line Model 100) at 50°C (a temperature commonly experienced by tropical ants within the boundary layer on unshaded branches: Spicer et al. ) for 70 min. We removed vials at 10‐min intervals to check for ant mortality before placing them back into the oven.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we did not find a curvilinear relationship, as predicted, suggesting that there are additional factors that could be usefully incorporated into our model. For example, arboreality will expose species to different thermal conditions from ground level to the canopy (Bakken, ; Scheffers et al, ; Spicer et al, ). Although we attempted to account for the major temperature differences between ground‐dwelling and arboreal lizards, more precise data on perch height and type could improve predictions of T b in treed environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…suggesting that there are additional factors that could be usefully incorporated into our model. For example, arboreality will expose species to different thermal conditions from ground level to the canopy (Bakken, 1989;Scheffers et al, 2013;Spicer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface dwelling ants exposed to shade have CTmax values that are 3.5-5 °C lower than those of canopy ants (Kaspari et al 2015), while resistance to desiccation is also affected by these habitat differences (Bujan et al 2016). Microhabitat features that are used differently by species can further modify temperature responses, such as the extent to which ants are exposed to sun flecks through the forest canopy (Spicer et al 2017) and spiders are exposed to shading from rocks (van den Berg et al 2015). Stress exposure is also influenced by diel patterns of activity of a species (Verble-Pearson et al 2015).…”
Section: Environmental Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other criteria can also be used, depending on the species. In ants, it is possible to monitor behavioral responses to hot areas and to determine at what temperature these areas are abandoned (Spicer et al 2017). It is also possible to measure body temperature directly in live and dead individuals to see if thermal limits are exceeded (Hemmings & Andrew 2017).…”
Section: Relevant Vulnerability Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%