2010
DOI: 10.1086/648567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Effects on Organismal Performance: Is Hotter Better?

Abstract: Despite decades of research on the evolution of thermal physiology, at least one fundamental issue remains unresolved: whether the maximal performance of a genotype depends on its optimal temperature. One school argues that warm-adapted genotypes will outperform cold-adapted genotypes because high temperatures inevitably accelerate chemical reactions. Yet another school holds that biochemical adaptation can compensate for thermodynamic effects on performance. Here, we briefly discuss this theoretical debate an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
307
8
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
32
307
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, if on the one hand higher temperatures promote a better performance, which possibly will translate in positive effects on fitness (Huey & Kingsolver 1989; Angilletta et al . 2010), on the other hand, higher temperatures associated with low relativity humidity increase the potential for water evaporation, which may culminate in dehydration that, as we found, had the most severe consequences at higher temperatures. Such potential trade‐off may be of limited importance if water availability is plenty and animals can be active at optimal temperatures without compromising their osmotic balance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Thus, if on the one hand higher temperatures promote a better performance, which possibly will translate in positive effects on fitness (Huey & Kingsolver 1989; Angilletta et al . 2010), on the other hand, higher temperatures associated with low relativity humidity increase the potential for water evaporation, which may culminate in dehydration that, as we found, had the most severe consequences at higher temperatures. Such potential trade‐off may be of limited importance if water availability is plenty and animals can be active at optimal temperatures without compromising their osmotic balance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…While increasing temperature tends to increase the rate of biochemical processes, this does not necessarily extend to all aspects of physiology, and increasing temperature may not positively correlate with improved immune competence (Angilletta, Huey, & Frazier, 2010; Murdock et al., 2012; Suwanchaichinda & Paskewitz, 1998). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, when raised at 258C, flies from T populations performed better at 258C but worse at 168C than did flies raised at 168C. The best performance was observed in flies that evolved, developed and were tested at 258C, supporting the view that 'hotter is better' [23]. Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%