2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00876-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoluminescence glow-curve deconvolution functions for mixed order of kinetics and continuous trap distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the trap level is not regarded as a discrete energy level located in the band gap of the host material, but rather a continuum of energy levels around a certain mean value. This possibility has been explored by various authors, 21,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and three main types of trap distributions have been considered: uniform, exponential, and Gaussian profiles.…”
Section: Continuous Trap Depth Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the trap level is not regarded as a discrete energy level located in the band gap of the host material, but rather a continuum of energy levels around a certain mean value. This possibility has been explored by various authors, 21,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and three main types of trap distributions have been considered: uniform, exponential, and Gaussian profiles.…”
Section: Continuous Trap Depth Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computerized glow-curve deconvolution (CGCD) has been the most common technique for the TL glowcurve analysis (Horowitz and Yossian, 1995;Kitis and Gomez-Ros, 2000). The studies on the TL of solids were dominated by the well known first-order kinetic (Randall and Wilikin, 1945) and second-order kinetics (Garlick and Gibson, 1948).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These glow curves were analyzed considering the mixed-order kinetics (MOK) model, which was considered the more adequate model, because they exhibited a complex luminescence glow emission; however, there are other possibilities (Gomez-Ros et al, 2006a) to analyze the trapped charge distribution assuming a Gaussian or exponential distribution due to the thermal release of charge carriers from the trapping centers. Because the structure of the TL glow curve was complex, a computerized glow curve deconvolution (CGCD) was used (Kitis and Gomez-Ros, 2000) to obtain the kinetic parameters, the activation energy E [eV] and the frequency Table 1 Characteristics of the polymer films with 0.025 ml/0.25 in 2 dimensions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%