2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11012-013-9818-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermophoresis particle deposition effects in a free convective doubly stratified medium over a vertical plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As specified by Batchelor and Shen [39], K values are from 0.2 to 1.2. The Knudsen number (Kn) is the most important factor in determining the thermophoretic coefficient K. Depending on the flow regime, a variety of formulations for evaluating K are available in the literature and K is well-defined by Talbot et al [38] as ( [40,41] are l g and l p are the thermal conductivities of the fluid and diffused particles respectively.…”
Section: Thermophoretic Particle Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As specified by Batchelor and Shen [39], K values are from 0.2 to 1.2. The Knudsen number (Kn) is the most important factor in determining the thermophoretic coefficient K. Depending on the flow regime, a variety of formulations for evaluating K are available in the literature and K is well-defined by Talbot et al [38] as ( [40,41] are l g and l p are the thermal conductivities of the fluid and diffused particles respectively.…”
Section: Thermophoretic Particle Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of investigations of thermophoretic effects in both non-magnetic and magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) boundary layer flows have been reported in recent years. These include Ganesan et al [37] who considered free convection. Das et al [38] used a shooting numerical method to analyse MHD slip from with wall transpiration and variable viscosity and thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%