2021
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10501920.2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermospheric Composition and Solar EUV Flux from the Global-scale Observations of the Limb and Disk (GOLD) mission

Abstract: This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…∑O/N 2 can be derived from the observed O 135.6 nm and N 2 Lyman‐Birge‐Hopfield (LBH) radiances (Strickland et al., 1999, 2001, 1995). ∑O/N 2 is obtained by integrating densities of O and N 2 from infinity down to an altitude where the column number density of N 2 is 1 × 10 17 /cm 2 and thus it is actually defined on a constant pressure surface with no altitude information (Correira et al., 2020). O and N 2 number densities decrease exponentially with altitude, so the column number densities of O and N 2 at the altitude where the N 2 column number density is 1 × 10 17 /cm 2 is mainly from altitudes immediately above this level (∼140–180 km) (Yu, Ren, Le, et al., 2020; Yu, Ren, Yu, et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…∑O/N 2 can be derived from the observed O 135.6 nm and N 2 Lyman‐Birge‐Hopfield (LBH) radiances (Strickland et al., 1999, 2001, 1995). ∑O/N 2 is obtained by integrating densities of O and N 2 from infinity down to an altitude where the column number density of N 2 is 1 × 10 17 /cm 2 and thus it is actually defined on a constant pressure surface with no altitude information (Correira et al., 2020). O and N 2 number densities decrease exponentially with altitude, so the column number densities of O and N 2 at the altitude where the N 2 column number density is 1 × 10 17 /cm 2 is mainly from altitudes immediately above this level (∼140–180 km) (Yu, Ren, Le, et al., 2020; Yu, Ren, Yu, et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical random, systematic, and model uncertainties in the GOLD O/N 2 are about 5%, 5%, and 30%–40%, respectively. Note that the model uncertainty is a bias with an unknown sign (Correira et al., 2021).…”
Section: Data Models and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the 2 × 2 binned version 3 O/N 2 data, named as ‘Level 2—ON2’ in the GOLD data repository. Also, as the GOLD O/N 2 is not optimized for auroral latitudes (Correira et al., 2021), the latitudes above ±60° are not used in the current analysis. Typical random, systematic, and model uncertainties in the GOLD O/N 2 are about 5%, 5%, and 30%–40%, respectively.…”
Section: Data Models and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the peak altitude of emission increases with solar zenith angle (SZA) and neutral temperature increases rapidly with height, there is a weak (<20%) dependence of the GOLD effective temperature on SZA, particularly above ∼60°. GOLD infers ΣO/N 2 from atomic oxygen 135.6 nm and molecular nitrogen LBH band emissions (Correira et al., 2020). The disk temperature and ΣO/N 2 are not retrieved when the SZA is greater than 80° or the view angle from the local nadir, referred to as the emission angle, is greater than 75°.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%