2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0159-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thick Melanoma: Prognostic Value of Positive Sentinel Nodes

Abstract: To be accurately informed about a patient's prognosis and to decide whether subsequent completion lymph node dissection is indicated, SNB should not be omitted in patients with a primary thick melanoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18 In contrast, multiple studies have demonstrated that the status of the sentinel lymph node is predictive of survival with node-negative patients having a 5-year survival of 56-71% versus 26-48% with node-positive disease. [30][31][32][33][34] In a recent metaanalysis by Rondelli et al, 35 and colleagues SNB status was predictive of survival with a 71% 5-year survival if node(s) was negative for disease and 39% if positive. 35 Our findings are similar with a 5-year DSS of 75.4% for negative sentinel node patients versus 44.1 % in node-positive patients (Fig). In addition, as new immunotherapy regimens for melanoma are studied in the adjuvant setting, the status of SNB may provide important information for patient selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…18 In contrast, multiple studies have demonstrated that the status of the sentinel lymph node is predictive of survival with node-negative patients having a 5-year survival of 56-71% versus 26-48% with node-positive disease. [30][31][32][33][34] In a recent metaanalysis by Rondelli et al, 35 and colleagues SNB status was predictive of survival with a 71% 5-year survival if node(s) was negative for disease and 39% if positive. 35 Our findings are similar with a 5-year DSS of 75.4% for negative sentinel node patients versus 44.1 % in node-positive patients (Fig). In addition, as new immunotherapy regimens for melanoma are studied in the adjuvant setting, the status of SNB may provide important information for patient selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While clinically node-negative patients with 4-mm or thicker tumors have a 60% to 70% risk of regional micrometastatic disease and a 70% risk of occult systemic disease at the time of presentation, 48 multiple authors make a case for SLNB in this subgroup because SLNB status is a powerful predictor of overall survival by univariate and multivariate analysis. [48][49][50][51][52][53][54] For the single informative case series of patients with thick tumors reported by Essner et al, 21 in which the CM-related death rate for the cohort was 31.0%, risk of CM-related death was 32.5% for cases with a positive SLNB result and 30.1% for cases with a negative SLNB result, with a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 2-73 months) (eTable 1). In this report, tumor status of the SLNB was predictive of diseasefree survival but not overall survival.…”
Section: Usefulness Of Slnb In Predicting Cm-related Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-related disparities in surgical management of primitive melanoma A significant proportion of patients with thick melanomas do not undergo lymph node staging with SLNB, despite the fact that it has been recommended by guidelines since 1998 and supported by retrospective and prospective institutional data [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] There are several possible explanations for this discrepancy. For example, multimorbidity could have precluded the use of SLNB in older patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%