2016
DOI: 10.1080/14675986.2016.1150649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinking interculturally: decolonizing history and citizenship education in Québec

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Otro de los elementos causales respecto a la limitada repercusión de los contenidos educativos indígenas en el proceso de formación inicial docente está asociado a elementos históricos y sociales (Desroches, 2016). Los prejuicios sociales y la tradición discriminatoria de la población occidental hacia los pueblos indígenas han consolidado relaciones sociales asimétricas entre ambas culturas (Merino, Becerra y De Fina, 2017).…”
Section: Formación Intercultural Docente En El Contexto Nacional Chilunclassified
“…Otro de los elementos causales respecto a la limitada repercusión de los contenidos educativos indígenas en el proceso de formación inicial docente está asociado a elementos históricos y sociales (Desroches, 2016). Los prejuicios sociales y la tradición discriminatoria de la población occidental hacia los pueblos indígenas han consolidado relaciones sociales asimétricas entre ambas culturas (Merino, Becerra y De Fina, 2017).…”
Section: Formación Intercultural Docente En El Contexto Nacional Chilunclassified
“…Similarly, Zembylas (2017) argues the need for decolonial strategies and pedagogical/curricular possibilities to bring a more multiperspectival and pluriversal understanding of human experience. While there is now a small but growing literature exploring decolonialism and decolonial education (see DesRoches, 2016;Gorski, 2008;Takayama, Sriprakash, & Connell, 2017), Daza and Tuck (2014) remind us "de/colonizing, (post)(anti)colonial and Indigenous studies, theories, and issues were not part of mainstream education until very recently". Instead they were seen as "subfields of critical, antioppressive, ethnic, and multicultural education -which were also kept to the outskirts of mainstream/Whitestream conversations about education" (p. 307).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%