1987
DOI: 10.1378/chest.91.6.813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoracic Needle Biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the six cases with no obvious source of error, the presence of on-site cytopathology assessment at the time of the biopsy procedure, for evaluation of either a fine needle aspiration sample or a touch prep of a CNB, may be helpful to determine tissue viability and predict the adequacy of subsequent CNBs taken from the area. 4145 Based on this error analysis, forthcoming clinical trials (BATTLE-2 and BATTLE-FL) have incorporated the use of real-time cytopathology assessment to determine tissue viability; and, if no clear lesion can be selected for biopsy based on the available diagnostic imaging, the IR has been requesting a FDG-PET/CT to optimize lesion selection prior to biopsy. It remains to be seen whether the implementation of these measures will improve diagnostic yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the six cases with no obvious source of error, the presence of on-site cytopathology assessment at the time of the biopsy procedure, for evaluation of either a fine needle aspiration sample or a touch prep of a CNB, may be helpful to determine tissue viability and predict the adequacy of subsequent CNBs taken from the area. 4145 Based on this error analysis, forthcoming clinical trials (BATTLE-2 and BATTLE-FL) have incorporated the use of real-time cytopathology assessment to determine tissue viability; and, if no clear lesion can be selected for biopsy based on the available diagnostic imaging, the IR has been requesting a FDG-PET/CT to optimize lesion selection prior to biopsy. It remains to be seen whether the implementation of these measures will improve diagnostic yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recommendations are based partly on the results of the current study and partly on applying principles, such as on-site cytopathology assessment to improve yield, that have been tested previously in the diagnostic setting. 4145 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A definitive diagnosis of malignancy is yielded in 50-95% of malignant pulmonary lesions, depending upon their size and location. 4,[8][9][10]13,15,18 However, a definitive benign diagnosis is generally obtained in < 50% and may be as low as 12%. 3,6 There are two main limitations associated with the FNA technique: (1) the cytologic aspirate obtained provides a relatively small sample, sometimes from a noninvolved area (sample error), and (2) cytologic interpretive error may occur with disease processes that are better defined by an overall morphologic pattern rather than by individual cytologic features, so a specific diagnosis is infrequently obtained from aspirated cytologic material in benign lesions (Figures 1 and 2).…”
Section: Comparison Of Fna and Pcnb In The Specific Diagnosis Of Benimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have also supported the utility and reliability of FNA in the diagnosis of intrapulmonary malignant tumors, with accuracy rates falling between 80 and 95% [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Specifically, in a direct comparison between FNA and CNB in the same patient, Gong et al [27] demonstrated that for malignant tumors the diagnostic accuracy of FNA was comparable to that of CNB, with an accuracy of 85.1 and 86.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%