1990
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290190306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐dimensional boundary element reservoir model for seismic analysis of arch and gravity dams

Abstract: /npsi/ctrl?lang=en http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?lang=fr Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/jsp/nparc_cp.jsp?lang=en NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRCThis publication could be one of several versions: author's original, accepted manuscript or the publisher's version. / La version de cette publication peut être l'une des suivantes : la version prépubli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is important to understand the dynamic characteristics of liquid-tank interaction. 150 D. ZHOU AND W. LIU Numerous investigations on liquid-structure interaction can be found in literature, using different methods such as finite element methods [4,5], boundary element methods [6][7][8], analytical methods [9][10][11] and semi-analytical methods [12][13][14][15][16]. There is no doubt that the numerical methods such as finite element, boundary element or their combination can resolve the liquidstructure interaction especially for structures with complex geometry, however, the modelling, code preparation and numerical computation generally require a long time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to understand the dynamic characteristics of liquid-tank interaction. 150 D. ZHOU AND W. LIU Numerous investigations on liquid-structure interaction can be found in literature, using different methods such as finite element methods [4,5], boundary element methods [6][7][8], analytical methods [9][10][11] and semi-analytical methods [12][13][14][15][16]. There is no doubt that the numerical methods such as finite element, boundary element or their combination can resolve the liquidstructure interaction especially for structures with complex geometry, however, the modelling, code preparation and numerical computation generally require a long time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, BEM and FEM can be used together for a tank's analysis, here the liquid can be modelled using BEM, and the tank walls are modelled using FEM, thus providing the benefits of both approaches. This advantage has prompted several researchers to use this method to solve the FSI problem in dams [75][76][77] and tanks [78][79][80][81][82]. The governing equation of motion for a coupled tank-fluid system based on FEM-BEM is as follows:…”
Section: Direct Modelling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reservoir with irregular geometry, numerical methods such as finite element method must be used, because an analytical solution cannot obtain the results for the arbitrary boundary and geometry of the system. Jablonski and Humar (1990) [8] applied the boundary element method in frequency domain for seismic analysis of concrete dams. The Monte Carlo method is a simulation method, one of the common goals of which is to estimate the specific parameters and probability distributions of random variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%