“…However, many of these methods involved cumbersome implementations, complicated expressions for the corrections, and numerical stability issues when the grid aspect ratio of the rectangular lattice (defined later) is significantly far off from unity (i.e., characterizing strong grid stretching in one of the directions relative to the other) or for simulating flows with relatively low viscosities or high Reynolds numbers. On the other hand, recognizing that the use of central moments, which naturally preserves the Galilean invariance of those moments independently supported by the lattice, can significantly improve the stability and accuracy when compared to the use of raw moments [6,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,31,32,33], we recently constructed a rectangular central moment LB method (RC-LBM) [34], which was then further extended to three-dimensions with an improved implementation strategy [35]. While the original central moment LB scheme was constructed using an orthogonal moment basis [6], Geier et al [7] in 2015 provided a detailed discussion on the role of the moment basis in their development of a cumulant LB method and also constructed a variety of collision models, including those based on raw moments, central moments and cumulants using non-orthogonal moment basis and presented them in the various appendices of [7].…”