2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12583-011-0191-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional conjugate gradient inversion of magnetotelluric impedance tensor data

Abstract: We developed a three-dimensional (3D) conjugate gradient inversion algorithm for inverting magnetotelluric impedance tensor measurements. In order to show the importance of including diagonal components of magnetotelluric impedance tensor in 3D inversion, synthetic data were inverted using the 3D conjugate gradient inversion, and the inversion results were compared and analyzed. The results from the 3D inversion of synthetic data indicate that both the off-diagonal and the diagonal components are required in i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 8, NLCG is the inversion results of the algorithm in this paper; REBOCC is the results of Numerical domain inversion method proposed by Weerachai (2006) [12] ; CG is the conjugate gradient inversion results proposed by Lin C H (2010) [13] ; RRI is the rapid relaxation inversion results proposed by Tan H D et al (2003) [14] . Through the comparison of 4 inversion methods, we can summarize that the results of the 4 inversion methods are similar.…”
Section: The Contrast Of Inversion Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 8, NLCG is the inversion results of the algorithm in this paper; REBOCC is the results of Numerical domain inversion method proposed by Weerachai (2006) [12] ; CG is the conjugate gradient inversion results proposed by Lin C H (2010) [13] ; RRI is the rapid relaxation inversion results proposed by Tan H D et al (2003) [14] . Through the comparison of 4 inversion methods, we can summarize that the results of the 4 inversion methods are similar.…”
Section: The Contrast Of Inversion Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%