2005
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2343040359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional Dynamic Susceptibility-weighted Perfusion MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Feasibility and Contrast Agent Dose

Abstract: With echo-shifted multishot echo-planar imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at high field strength is feasible without relevant image distortions. Compared with contrast agent dose for 1.5 T imaging, the dose for 3.0 T can be reduced to 0.10 mmol.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
35
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…12,15,17,20,21 Previous studies investigated the relationship between preload amount and T1-weighted leakage correction; however, the issue remains unresolved 15,17,21 and is likely further confounded at higher field strengths. Because 3T DSC enables a smaller contrast bolus compared with 1.5T with similar data quality, 22 we used a stepwise preload dosing protocol with half-dose incremental steps as part of a separate study to optimize T1-weighted leakage correction and minimize patient contrast load. 18 The details of that study are beyond the scope of this article; in short, we determined an optimal protocol to be 0.1-mmol/kg Omniscan preload given 6 minutes before DSC acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,15,17,20,21 Previous studies investigated the relationship between preload amount and T1-weighted leakage correction; however, the issue remains unresolved 15,17,21 and is likely further confounded at higher field strengths. Because 3T DSC enables a smaller contrast bolus compared with 1.5T with similar data quality, 22 we used a stepwise preload dosing protocol with half-dose incremental steps as part of a separate study to optimize T1-weighted leakage correction and minimize patient contrast load. 18 The details of that study are beyond the scope of this article; in short, we determined an optimal protocol to be 0.1-mmol/kg Omniscan preload given 6 minutes before DSC acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dosage, at high field strength, provides strong signal intensity to noise while minimizing patient contrast load. 33 …”
Section: Preoperative Dsc-mr Imaging Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSC-MR imaging coregistration enabled region-of-interest placement for rCBV calculation within previously recorded stereotactic locations of corresponding surgical tissue specimens, as previously described. [33][34][35] All regions of interest were also inspected to ensure exclusion of visible large vessels.…”
Section: Coregistration Of Stereotactic and Dsc-mr Imaging Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSC-MRI sequence was a 3D PRESTO acquisition (effective TE ϭ 30 ms, TR ϭ 20 ms, 48 [first visit of patient] or 30 [second visit] slices, dynamic resolution 1.5 sec, SENSE factor 2.5) and 15 mL of contrast agent (Magnevist, Schering, Germany) was injected at a rate of 5 mL/sec followed by a chaser of 25 mL saline, also injected at 5 mL/sec (14,15).…”
Section: Mr Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%