2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional identification of flow-induced noise sources with a tunnel-shaped array of MEMS microphones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the most advanced surface-mounted MEMS microphones provide the necessary small size, sensitivity, and dynamic range, their bandwidth is in the range of consumer MEMS microphones: up to 20 kHz [6], limited to 6 kHz for those with higher dynamic range [4] or with a maximum of 10 kHz in multi-sensor arrays [7]. Aeromic's new dual-frequency piezoelectric MEMS microphones combine in each sensor two thin triangular structures similar in appearance, but different in size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the most advanced surface-mounted MEMS microphones provide the necessary small size, sensitivity, and dynamic range, their bandwidth is in the range of consumer MEMS microphones: up to 20 kHz [6], limited to 6 kHz for those with higher dynamic range [4] or with a maximum of 10 kHz in multi-sensor arrays [7]. Aeromic's new dual-frequency piezoelectric MEMS microphones combine in each sensor two thin triangular structures similar in appearance, but different in size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface mount package has dimensions of 3.50 mm x 2.65 mm x 0.98 mm [9]. Furthermore, an array of 256 MEMS microphones has even been successfully deployed for aero-acoustic measurements and used in open wind tunnel tests [7]. In this case the sensors are custom-made and grouped in arrays of 8 synchronized elements that are connected to a PC to measure up to 10 kHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aeroacoustic testing, one must distinguish between in-flow sensors, which are mounted on any kind of surface that is exposed to the flow-field, and out-of-flow sensors, which are mounted out of the flow-field of an open jet wind tunnel. A recent example with out-of-flow sensors by Zhou et al [ 4 ] shows the application of a 256 MEMS microphone array in an open jet wind tunnel for aeroacoustic measurements. In the current paper, only the in-flow placement of acoustic sensors and their unique problems are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%