“…Counterfeiting, prevalent in banknotes, confidential documents, brands, pharmaceuticals, and jewelry, has become a serious worldwide problem because it causes harmful impacts on global economy, security, and health. , Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop more reliable anticounterfeiting techniques with improved security levels, easy identification, and difficulty of duplication. In the past several decades, various kinds of anticounterfeiting techniques have been developed to combat counterfeiting and information leakage, such as plasmonic security labels, watermarks, holograms, magnetic response, and fluorescent anticounterfeiting. − Among them, fluorescent anticounterfeiting technology based on fluorescent materials particularly attracts much attention and has been widely used in the fields of data storage and information security due to its remarkable properties of high throughput, flexible design, low cost, and facile operation. − However, conventional fluorescent materials only provide static optical outputs, − which are easily duplicated by certain substitutes with similar emission characteristics, resulting in poor anticounterfeiting performance. In contrast, fluorescent materials with stimuli-responsive ability, which can alter their optical outputs of spectra and lifetime in response to external stimuli, have drawn considerable attention in security protection field. − In recent years, a variety of stimuli-responsive fluorescent materials, including transition-metal complexes, organic dyes, , lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles, inorganic quantum dots, ,, polymers dots, , metal–organic frameworks, and perovskites have been investigated. − Upon exposure to specific external stimuli, these materials were capable of changing optical outputs through controlling the energy transfer paths, , regulating the microstructures, ,, or adjusting their chemical constitutions, which provided extra security features and improved security levels for anticounterfeiting efforts.…”