2019
DOI: 10.1177/2041731418824797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional printing of a patient-specific engineered nasal cartilage for augmentative rhinoplasty

Abstract: Autologous cartilages or synthetic nasal implants have been utilized in augmentative rhinoplasty to reconstruct the nasal shape for therapeutic and cosmetic purposes. Autologous cartilage is considered to be an ideal graft, but has drawbacks, such as limited cartilage source, requirements of additional surgery for obtaining autologous cartilage, and donor site morbidity. In contrast, synthetic nasal implants are abundantly available but have low biocompatibility than the autologous cartilages. Moreover, the cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first confirmed tBP as a cell-friendly scaffold regarding the in vitro cytotoxicity on hADSCs (Figures 4-6), and its ability to support hADSC attachment and proliferation ( Figure 7). These results about the in vitro biocompatibility of tBP demonstrate its capability to repair and regenerate tissues (Yi et al, 2019), therefore contributing to the integration and maintenance of the grafted tBP in augmentation rhinoplasty. In order to strengthen the application potential of tBP in augmentation rhinoplasty, tBP was evaluated for supporting the chondrogenic differentiation of hADSCs.…”
Section: Gapdhmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We first confirmed tBP as a cell-friendly scaffold regarding the in vitro cytotoxicity on hADSCs (Figures 4-6), and its ability to support hADSC attachment and proliferation ( Figure 7). These results about the in vitro biocompatibility of tBP demonstrate its capability to repair and regenerate tissues (Yi et al, 2019), therefore contributing to the integration and maintenance of the grafted tBP in augmentation rhinoplasty. In order to strengthen the application potential of tBP in augmentation rhinoplasty, tBP was evaluated for supporting the chondrogenic differentiation of hADSCs.…”
Section: Gapdhmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…MSC three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an emerging technology that is expected to revolutionize the field of regenerative medicine [6,20,[38][39][40], including hyaline articular cartilage engineering [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Previous tissue engineering approaches for cartilage repair usually failed to generate functional tissues recapitulating the zonal organization, extracellular matrix (ECM) content, and biomechanical properties of native cartilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And 3D printing technology can provide a reasonable structure for adipose stem cells in tissue engineering. So it can be used for rebuilding the nasal type (Yi et al, 2019), auricle regeneration (Lee et al, 2014; Visscher et al, 2016), rebuilding the maxillofacial cartilage (Morrison et al, 2018), filling defect of bone (Roskies et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2016; Wenz, Borchers, Tovar, & Kluger, 2017), reconstruction of blood vessels (Zhao et al, 2016), and even printing organs (Kapur et al, 2012). Noor et al (2019) reprogrammed the omental tissue cells into pluripotent stem cells and then differentiated them into cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells.…”
Section: Printing and Organs Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%