We reanalyze published magnetization data and demonstrate that the conclusion of the original authors, claiming enhanced two-dimensional properties of the cuprate superconductor TlBa2Ca3Cu4Oy, is not supported by the experimental results. Our analysis shows that the magnetic field dependence of the mixed-state magnetization for this particular sample is amazingly close to the results of numerical calculations by E. H. Brandt for an ideal vortex lattice without fluctuations. This good agreement between experiment and theory allows for the evaluation of the absolute values of the upper critical field Hc2(T ).PACS numbers: 74.25. Op, 74.25.Qt, We consider the recent study of the magnetization in the superconducting state of TlBa 2 Ca 3 Cu 4 O y .1 While we appreciate the high quality of the experimental data, we question most of the conclusions that were made in Ref.1. As we argue below, the questionable conclusions are not due to some obvious errors in the data analysis but rather a consequence of the inadequacy of the methods that are traditionally used for the analyses of equilibrium magnetization data obtained for the mixed state of type-II superconductors.The tool most often used for such analyses is the Hao-Clem model 2 which represents an analytical approximation to the Ginzburg-Landau theory of the Abrikosov vortex lattice.3 It is commonly accepted that this model provides a quantitative description of the mixed state magnetization in high-T c superconductors (HTSC) and offers the possibility to calculate the thermodynamic critical field H c and the Ginzburg-Landau parameter κ from experimental magnetization data. It has been noticed that the use of this model for the interpretation of corresponding M (H) data practically always leads to unphysical results, such as a strong increase of the calculated κ values with increasing temperature. 1,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18 Instead of rising some doubts in the validity of the model, this feature was taken as evidence of a particularly strong influence of thermal fluctuations on the sample magnetization at temperatures still well below T c . 1,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 However, we recently demonstrated that the fluctuation induced corrections to the magnetization remain negligibly small up to temperatures very close to T c , 21 thus suggesting a more general inadequacy of the model. While on previous occasions we could only speculate on the origin of the failure of the model, we are now able to show that most likely it is the insufficient accuracy in the calculation of M (H, κ) using the Hao-Clem model.For our data analysis we use a simple scaling procedure developed in Ref. 22. Subsequent work demonstrated that this scaling procedure may successfully be used for analysing the reversible magnetization data, collected for numerous samples of different families of HTSC's and available in the literature. 22,23,24 One of the main advantages of this scaling approach is that no specific M (H) dependence needs to be assumed a priori. The proc...