2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional variable-node elements based upon CS-FEM for elastic–plastic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(135 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A solution to this problem, the smoothed finite element method (S‐FEM) based on generalized smoothed Galerkin (GS‐Galerkin) weak form, was proposed by Liu et al 26‐29 The strain smoothing technique 30 is used to convert the element‐based calculations of standard FEM into different smoothing domain calculations. According to the way to construct smooth domains in element, smoothed finite elements are classified into node‐based smoothed FEM (NS‐FEM), 31‐38 Cell‐based smoothed FEM (CS‐FEM), 39‐43 edge‐based smoothed FEM (ES‐FEM), 44‐49 and face‐based smoothed FEM (FS‐FEM), 50‐53 etc. A large number of numerical experiments show that ES‐FEM and FS‐FEM have excellent h‐convergence characteristics, accuracy and temporal and spatial stability, which can greatly improve the performance of tetrahedral elements 53 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution to this problem, the smoothed finite element method (S‐FEM) based on generalized smoothed Galerkin (GS‐Galerkin) weak form, was proposed by Liu et al 26‐29 The strain smoothing technique 30 is used to convert the element‐based calculations of standard FEM into different smoothing domain calculations. According to the way to construct smooth domains in element, smoothed finite elements are classified into node‐based smoothed FEM (NS‐FEM), 31‐38 Cell‐based smoothed FEM (CS‐FEM), 39‐43 edge‐based smoothed FEM (ES‐FEM), 44‐49 and face‐based smoothed FEM (FS‐FEM), 50‐53 etc. A large number of numerical experiments show that ES‐FEM and FS‐FEM have excellent h‐convergence characteristics, accuracy and temporal and spatial stability, which can greatly improve the performance of tetrahedral elements 53 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems such as vibration and dynamic analysis [12,13], elastic-plastic analysis [14,15], fracture mechanics [16,17,18], heat transfer [19,20], structural acoustics [21,22,23], contact problems [24], adaptive analysis [25,26], impact problem [27] and many more. These researches show that compared with the FEM, SFEMs have many advantages in treating different problems, specifically when there are large deformations and nonlinear material behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%