2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016jc011942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal flow separation at protruding beach nourishments

Abstract: In recent years, the application of large‐scale beach nourishments has been discussed, with the Sand Motor in the Netherlands as the first real‐world example. Such protruding beach nourishments have an impact on tidal currents, potentially leading to tidal flow separation and the generation of tidal eddies of length scales larger than the nourishment itself. The present study examines the characteristics of the tidal flow field around protruding beach nourishments under varying nourishment geometry and tidal c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were collected during a field campaign at the Sand Engine mega‐nourishment as a part of the MEGA‐Perturbation EXperiment in the fall of 2014 on the Delfland Coast of the Netherlands (Radermacher et al, ). Since the installment of the 21.5 million cubic meters of sand in 2011, the Sand Engine has dramatically changed shape (Stive et al, ); in 2011 it stretched 2 km in the alongshore and 1 km into the North Sea, and in 2014 it stretched 4 km alongshore and 800 m in the cross shore (Radermacher et al, ). The large‐scale morphology is considered very dynamic with observable bathymetric changes over periods of days to months.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were collected during a field campaign at the Sand Engine mega‐nourishment as a part of the MEGA‐Perturbation EXperiment in the fall of 2014 on the Delfland Coast of the Netherlands (Radermacher et al, ). Since the installment of the 21.5 million cubic meters of sand in 2011, the Sand Engine has dramatically changed shape (Stive et al, ); in 2011 it stretched 2 km in the alongshore and 1 km into the North Sea, and in 2014 it stretched 4 km alongshore and 800 m in the cross shore (Radermacher et al, ). The large‐scale morphology is considered very dynamic with observable bathymetric changes over periods of days to months.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of episodic events on mixed wave-and-current energy systems is less well known, although recent studies at the Sand Engine in the Netherlands suggest that storm energy has a similar relationship to sediment transport in the presence of relatively weak tidal currents (<1 m/s) (Luijendijk et al, 2017) when wave-driven currents in the nearshore approach 1 m/s (Radermacher et al, 2017). Tidal currents observed near Katama (~3 m/s around the corner of Chappaquiddick Island and~2 m/s through the inlet) can be stronger than those observed at the Sand Engine (0.8 m/s), and wave-driven currents tend to be weaker owing to smaller wave angles relative to the shoreline orientation (typically 1 m/s at the Sand Engine compared with 0.2 to 0.9 m/s south of Katama Bay, depending on wave energy and direction).…”
Section: 1029/2017jc013708mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, tides were neglected in our model setup. Morphologic change in the surf zone could be influenced by tide-induced water level variations (Price et al, 2013), tide-driven currents, but also other tide-induced phenomena specific for curved coasts (e.g., tidal flow separation; Radermacher et al, 2017).…”
Section: Comparison With Observations and Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%