2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-017-0312-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal Stage Changes in Structure and Diversity of Intertidal Benthic Diatom Assemblages: a Case Study from Two Contrasting Charleston Harbor Flats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obvious distinctions between sand and mud samples were relatively high proportions of ASVs classified as Thalassiosira , Gyrosigma , Skeletonema , and Pleurosigma genera, in descending order, in the muddier sediment, while the sandy habitat was dominated by Amphora , Opephora , Halamphora , Lemnicola , Dimeregramma , and Serratifera . These results are generally in accord with previous studies (Ribeiro et al, 2013; Rivera‐Garcia et al, 2018). Furthermore, our findings confirm that epipsammic diatoms dominate sandy sites in that Amphora and Dimeregramma (Méléder et al, 2007; Ribeiro, 2010), as well as Opephora (Sabbe & Vyverman, 1995), are epipsammic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obvious distinctions between sand and mud samples were relatively high proportions of ASVs classified as Thalassiosira , Gyrosigma , Skeletonema , and Pleurosigma genera, in descending order, in the muddier sediment, while the sandy habitat was dominated by Amphora , Opephora , Halamphora , Lemnicola , Dimeregramma , and Serratifera . These results are generally in accord with previous studies (Ribeiro et al, 2013; Rivera‐Garcia et al, 2018). Furthermore, our findings confirm that epipsammic diatoms dominate sandy sites in that Amphora and Dimeregramma (Méléder et al, 2007; Ribeiro, 2010), as well as Opephora (Sabbe & Vyverman, 1995), are epipsammic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As seen in previous studies, α‐diversity differed by habitat type. The Shannon Index, driven primarily by greater evenness, demonstrated higher diversity on the sandflat than the mudflat, in general agreement with Rivera‐Garcia et al (2018) who also conducted their study in Grice Cove. Méléder et al (2007) and Ribeiro et al (2013) likewise observed low benthic diatom diversity in muddier sediments relative to sandy sites in the Tagus Estuary and Bourgneuf Bay, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Janousek (2009) and Semcheski et al (2016) reported higher MPB diversity in muddy sediments than in sandy sediments, a result of the depository nature of more protected muddy sites, and higher resistance of MPB biofilms on muddy sediments against erosion (Cahoon et al, 1999;Herman et al, 2001). Likewise, Scholz and Liebezeit (2012b) demonstrated that diversity decreases in coarser sediments, while other studies found higher diversity in sandbars than in mudflats from mixed assemblages (Paterson and Hagerthey, 2001;Underwood and Barnett, 2006;Jesus et al, 2009;Rivera-Garcia et al, 2018). These studies indicate that diversity patterns in relation to sediment types may differ, depending on how diversity was defined in the respective study (species or pigments), what communities were targeted (diatoms vs. mixed communities), and how samples were analyzed (chemotaxonomy, microscopy, and counting methods).…”
Section: Environmental Factors Mpb Biomass and Pigment Diversity Patt...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the last 15 years, DNA-and RNA-based surveys revolutionized research on marine plankton and benthos [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. DNA metabarcoding was also utilized to characterize microbial eukaryotes in some intertidal habitats [48][49][50][51] and salt marsh soils [52], but not in tidal pools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%