1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.50.8658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight-binding model for the transverse Shubnikov–de Haas effect in semiconductor superlattices

Abstract: The oscillatory part of the conductivity along the con6ning planes of a superlattice miniband under a perpendicular quantizing magnetic 6eld was calculated, assuming a tight-binding approximation for the miniband dispersion. The manifestation of the belly and neck cross sections of the Fermi surface is studied as a function of the broadening of the electronic energy levels, miniband widths, and energy minigaps. The efFects of the deviation from the nearest-neighbor tight-binding approximation upon the line sha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where d is the period of the superlattice, and by following the steps described in 13 , from equations (3,4) we can obtain an analytical expression for the PL intensity oscillations:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where d is the period of the superlattice, and by following the steps described in 13 , from equations (3,4) we can obtain an analytical expression for the PL intensity oscillations:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in an earlier paper [10], in order to determine the electronic density and the quantum mobility of the occupied subbands, our magnetoresistance traces (R xx ) were numerically differentiated, expressed as a function of the reciprocal magnetic field (1/B), and multiplied by a smooth window function (the Hanning function) before computing their fast Fourier transform (FFT). The quantum mobility of a specific subband was determined by the logarithmic dependence of the maximum amplitude of the FFT peak plotted against 1/B [11,12]. In these conditions, the slope of the straight line through the data is equal to π/µ i (i = 1, 2, 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in an earlier paper [10], in order to determine the electronic density and the quantum mobility of the occupied subbands, our magnetoresistance traces (R xx ) were numerically differentiated, expressed as a function of the reciprocal magnetic field (1/B), and multiplied by a smooth window function (the Hanning function) before computing their fast Fourier transform (FFT). The quantum mobility of a specific subband was determined by the logarithmic dependence of the maximum amplitude of the FFT peak plotted against 1/B [11,12]. In these conditions, the slope of the straight line through the data is equal to π/µ i (i = 1, 2, 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%