2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tilt and Decentration of Three-Piece Foldable High-Refractive Silicone and Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses With 6-mm Optics in an Intraindividual Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
46
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
46
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Tilt and decentration of the posterior IOLs are comparable to those with standard implantation of only 1 foldable IOL in the capsular bag. 27 In contrast, the anterior IOLs placed in the ciliary sulcus showed higher degrees of tilt and decentration, but no instability. One must take into consideration that the anterior IOLs were originally designed for the capsular bag and their 12.5 or 13.00 mm total diameter might be too small for sulcus implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Tilt and decentration of the posterior IOLs are comparable to those with standard implantation of only 1 foldable IOL in the capsular bag. 27 In contrast, the anterior IOLs placed in the ciliary sulcus showed higher degrees of tilt and decentration, but no instability. One must take into consideration that the anterior IOLs were originally designed for the capsular bag and their 12.5 or 13.00 mm total diameter might be too small for sulcus implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These decentration and tilt values were used because the mean IOL decentration reported in the literature ranges between 0.2 mm and 0.4 mm and the mean tilt, between 2 degrees and 4 degrees. [22][23][24][25][26] The MTF for the refractive-diffractive IOL was slightly affected by tilt; note that the cutoff frequency is stable at approximately 50 cpd, which corresponds to a Snellen decimal visual acuity of approximately 1.5 (20/13, visual resolution in white light). When the IOL was decentered (0.2 to 0.4 mm), the cutoff frequency was reduced to Radial projection averaged over all orientations of the 2-dimensional MTF for 780 nm and a 5 mm pupil versus spatial frequency (cpd) (distance focus) (diffraction-limited curve included for comparison).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical literature includes numerous reports of IOL tilt and decentration at different times after surgery or with different IOL types using commercial Scheimpflug instruments. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] With these instruments, the optical distortion is presumably not corrected. Only a recent study of IOL tilt and decentration in eyes with phakic lenses 29 using a Nidek Scheimpflug system mentions that images were corrected using custom algorithms.…”
Section: J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33:418-429 Q 2007 Ascrs and Escrsmentioning
confidence: 98%