2021
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2021.3111213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Frequency Sparse Reconstruction of Non-Uniform Sampling for Non-Stationary Signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8 displays the time signal and time-frequency spectrum of the 0.007-inch-fault bearing signal with five different amounts of additional noise, ranging from −6 dB to 6 dB, in order to better highlight the attributes of noisy signals in various domains. The spectrum is produced using short-time Fourier transform (STFT) over time windows [ 38 ], where the time outputs correspond to time window centres. As shown in Figure 8 , the spectrogram is clearly capable of revealing certain fault features, which are difficult to differentiate from jumbled time signals, and collecting vital visual information regarding bearing fault.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 displays the time signal and time-frequency spectrum of the 0.007-inch-fault bearing signal with five different amounts of additional noise, ranging from −6 dB to 6 dB, in order to better highlight the attributes of noisy signals in various domains. The spectrum is produced using short-time Fourier transform (STFT) over time windows [ 38 ], where the time outputs correspond to time window centres. As shown in Figure 8 , the spectrogram is clearly capable of revealing certain fault features, which are difficult to differentiate from jumbled time signals, and collecting vital visual information regarding bearing fault.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, after going through the fully connected layer and Softmax classifier, we obtain the predicted category information, combined with the label information, the cross-entropy loss can be calculated, denoted as 𝐿 𝐶 , as shown in Eq. (6).…”
Section: The Mk-mmd-based Transfer Diagnosis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional vibration signal analysis methods, such as short time Fourier transform (STFT) [8], wavelet packet transform (WPT) [9], empirical mode decomposition (EMD) [10] and singular value transform (SVD) [11], can process and analyze non-stationary and nonlinear vibration signals, but they cannot fully extract the rich information of fault features contained in the signal, causing the traditional machine learning diagnosis methods unable to meet the requirements of accurate bearing fault classification [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%