2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c04020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TiO2-Induced In Situ Reaction in Graphene Oxide-Reinforced AZ61 Biocomposites to Enhance the Interfacial Bonding

Abstract: Graphene oxide (GO) can improve the degradation resistance of biomedical Mg alloy because of its excellent impermeability and outstanding chemical inertness. However, the weak interfacial bonding between GO and Mg matrix leads to easily detaching during degradation. In this study, in situ reaction induced by TiO 2 took place in the AZ61−GO biocomposite to enhance the interfacial bonding between GO and Mg matrix. For the specific process, TiO 2 was uniformly and tightly deposited onto the GO surface by hydrothe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each specimen was submerged in a 15-ml centrifuge tube that contained 10 ml PBS solution, and the tubes were maintained at 37 °C in an incubator. After being incubated for various time duration (7, 14, 21 and 28 d), the specimens were taken out from the solution, rinsed with distilled water, and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 12 h. The weight loss was calculated by the following equation [ 28 ]: weight loss =( W 0 - W 1 )/ W 0 × 100%, where W 0 and W t were the original weight and the weight of the specimen after immersing in PBS up to day t , respectively. The pH of the degradation solution was measured once 7 d for 28 d. The morphologies of the specimens after degradation at different time intervals were studied using SEM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each specimen was submerged in a 15-ml centrifuge tube that contained 10 ml PBS solution, and the tubes were maintained at 37 °C in an incubator. After being incubated for various time duration (7, 14, 21 and 28 d), the specimens were taken out from the solution, rinsed with distilled water, and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 12 h. The weight loss was calculated by the following equation [ 28 ]: weight loss =( W 0 - W 1 )/ W 0 × 100%, where W 0 and W t were the original weight and the weight of the specimen after immersing in PBS up to day t , respectively. The pH of the degradation solution was measured once 7 d for 28 d. The morphologies of the specimens after degradation at different time intervals were studied using SEM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the degree of interface reaction and the formation of interface products have a great influence on the microstructure and properties of the biocermets. Appropriate interface products can improve the wettability and form a strong chemical bonding between the reinforcement and matrix [165].…”
Section: In Situ Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the Fe 3 O 4 content was further increased to 9% (Figure 5f), obvious agglomeration began to appear in the scaffold. Usually, on the premise of uniform dispersion, the more the amount of nanoparticles added, the better the enhancing effect [41]. When the Fe3O4 content was less than or equal to 7%, the uniformly dispersed Fe3O4 nanoparticles acted as a nanoscale reinforcement in the polymer matrix and reached a peak at 7%.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%