Tipologi Desa Berdasarkan Variabel Penciri Hutan Rakyat

Lastini, Tien; Suhendang, Endang; Jaya, Indra; Hardjanto, Hardjanto; Purnomo, Herry

doi:10.20886/jpht.2011.8.3.155-168

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Typology Analysis According to Lastini et al (2011), the biophysical and socio-economic factors that make up the forest typology are slope ratio, population density, productive ratio, and income. A critical area with slopes and valleys is one of the areas targeted for forestry development.…”

Section: Fragmentation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The more isolated an individual species, the more difficult it is to breed, which results in a decrease in population. A small patch of the forest will show that the higher the degradation degree, the conservation value has lower (Amalia et al, 2019;Lastini et al, 2011). Furthermore, Lastini et al (2011) stated that the essential characteristics of forest patches are related to species extinction due to limited resources.…”

Section: Forest Fragmentation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Typology refers to this characteristic of the regional grouping. Typology is also expected to help map the distribution of not yet known forests and have not been carried out in a comprehensive inventory (Lastini et al, 2011). This grouping aims to provide an overview of the areas and policies the government will carry out towards those areas.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Fragmentation Typology of Sumatran Tropical Lowland Forest, Labuhanbatu Selatan - Indonesia

Samsuri

Sitorus

Zaitunah

et al. 2021

indones. j. env. man. sus.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Forest land cover experienced changes caused by various factors. Deforestation and forest degradation decreased forest structure and size that produce forest fragmentation. This study aimed to determine spatial distribution patterns and typology of forest fragmentation in the Labuhanbatu Selatan district. The study uses land cover image analysis, forest fragmentation analysis, correlation analysis, and typology analysis. Forest fragmentation is determined based on patch area (CA), patch density (PD), contiguity index (CONTIG), and proximity index (PROX). The study analyzes the correlation between variable factors and the degrees of forest fragmentation to develop a typology of fragmentation forest. The variables used to construct the typology of forest fragmentation are population density, productive age ratio, income, and slope. The classification of forest fragmentation has been completed to create a forest fragmentation typology. To determine the typology of forest fragmentation, the K-Means Cluster analysis method is used. Typology of forests fragmentation of Labuhanbatu Selatan district is three typologies. Typology 1 is the low forest fragmentation of Torgamba, Silangkitang, and Kota Pinang sub-district, typology 2 is moderate forest fragmentation are the Kampung Rakyat, and Typology 3 is high forest fragmentation of Sungai Kanan sub-district.

show abstract

Section: Fragmentation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Forest Fragmentation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fragmentation Typology of Sumatran Tropical Lowland Forest, Labuhanbatu Selatan - Indonesia

Samsuri

Sitorus

Zaitunah

et al. 2021

indones. j. env. man. sus.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah dengan teknik klaster non-hierarki di mana jumlah kelas telah ditentukan menjadi dua klaster. Metode klaster dalam pembuatan tipologi juga pernah digunakan oleh Rahmadia (2003), Lastini (2011), dan Yulianto (2014. Status perkembangan desa terdiri dari dua kelas yakni klaster 1 mewakili desa tertinggal dan klaster 2 mewakili desa maju.…”

Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified

The Rural Development and Rural Self-Suffiency in Bogor District, West Java Province

Budiarto

Rustiadi²,

Dharmawan³

2017

tataloka

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan tipologi desa berdasarkan status perkembangan dan kemandirian desa. Status perkembangan desa dibangun dengan 11 indikator dan status kemandirian desa dibangun dengan enam indikator. Penelitian menggunakan data sekunder dari BPS yaitu PODES Tahun 2014 sejumlah 434 desa di Kabupaten Bogor. Data primer digunakan untuk mendukung hasil analisis diambil dengan observasi lapangan pada dua desa perwakilan tipologi II dan IV. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan status perkembangan terdapat 187 desa berstatus desa berkembang dan 247 desa berstatus desa tertinggal. Berdasarkan status kemandirian terdapat 78 desa dan 356 desa tidak mandiri. Berdasarkan status perkembangan dan kemandirian terdapat tiga desa masuk tipologi I (maju dan mandiri), 184 desa tipologi II (maju dan tidak mandiri), 172 desa termasuk tipologi III (tertinggal dan tidak mandiri), dan 75 desa termasuk tipologi IV (tertinggal dan mandiri). Nilai korelasi Spearman sebesar -0,371 dimana terdapat hubungan yang terbalik antara status perkembangan desa dengan status kemandirian desa.Kata kunci : tipologi desa, perkembangan desa, kemandirian desa Abstract: This study aimed at map rural typologies based on the status of development and selfsufficiency of the rurals. Status of rural development was built with 11 indicators and status selfsufficient was built with six indicators. The study used secondary data from BPS, wich was PODES 2014 in 434 villages at Bogor district. Primary data was used to support the analysis results with field observations taken at four village representatives typology. The results showed that 187 villages were categorized as developed rurals and 247 villages as undeveloped rurals. Based on self-sufficient status, there were 78 villages categorized as self-sufficient rurals and 356 villages as unself-sufficient rurals. Based on the status of development and self-sufficient, three villages were categorized as typology I (developed and self-suffient rurals), 184 villages were typology II (developed and unself-suffient rurals), 172 villages were typology III (undeveloped and unself-sufficient rurals), and 75 villages were typology IV (undeveloped and self-sufficient rurals). Spearman correlation value was -0.371, there was an inverse relationship between the development status and self-sufficiency status of the rural.

show abstract

“…Scientific Article ISSN: 2087-0469 expectation for certification to bring higher benefits (Rametsteiner 2002). Market instruments, such as pricepremium and improved market access are considered as incentives for forest managers in sustainable forest management (Rametsteiner & Simula 2003;Maryudi 2005;Lastini 2011). The forest policy on timber legality is required to create incentive of price-premium for the forest farmer.…”

Section: Data Analysis Basedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stakeholders Analysis of Policy-Making Process: The Case of Timber Legality Policy on Private Forest

Mulyaningrum

Kartodihardjo

Jaya

et al. 2013

jtfm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The stakeholder analysis shows that the interests and influences do not consider private forest farmers as primary stakeholder during the process of policy formulation. The strong national and international interests, supported by high authority could not be influnced by the role of the NGOs and academicians. The imbalance of responsibilities, rights, and revenues that was experienced by farmers as the manager of private forest when started implementing the policy was more as burdens, it means implementation of the policy was more as burdens. Strong relationships between the Ministry of Forestry with the state as a core could not empower the relationship with private forest farmers. As result, policy assumptions cannot be implemented properly.

show abstract

Tipologi Desa Berdasarkan Variabel Penciri Hutan Rakyat

Abstract: Biofisik, analisis gerombol, hutan rakyat, sosial ekonomi, tipologi desa 1 2 2 2 2 and Biophysical, clustering analysis, private forest, socioeconomic , village typologies

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Fragmentation Typology of Sumatran Tropical Lowland Forest, Labuhanbatu Selatan - Indonesia

Fragmentation Typology of Sumatran Tropical Lowland Forest, Labuhanbatu Selatan - Indonesia

The Rural Development and Rural Self-Suffiency in Bogor District, West Java Province

Stakeholders Analysis of Policy-Making Process: The Case of Timber Legality Policy on Private Forest

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About