Tissue Engineering: Intra‐Operative Bioprinting of Hard, Soft, and Hard/Soft Composite Tissues for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction (Adv. Funct. Mater. 29/2021)

Moncal, Kazim K.; Gudapati, Hemanth; Godzik, Kevin P.; Heo, Dong Nyoung; Kang, Young-Nam; Rizk, Elias; Ravnic, Dino J.; Wee, Hwabok; Pepley, David F.; Özbolat, Veli; Lewis, Gregory S.; Moore, Jason Z.; Driskell, Ryan R.; Samson, Thomas D.; Özbolat, İbrahim T.

doi:10.1002/adfm.202170212

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It combines principles from the life sciences and engineering to DOI: 10.1002/mame.202300246 restore, maintain, and enhance tissue function for the repair of diseased and defective tissues and organs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Due to the escalating prevalence of chronic diseases, congenital conditions, traffic accidents, and injuries, the global tissue engineering market has experienced significant growth in recent years. The market value is expected to reach ≈$30 billion by 2028.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oriented Porous Polymer Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of Preparation Strategies and Applications

Liu,

Wang,

Kuang

2023

Macro Materials & Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The pursuit of effective therapeutic strategies for tissue damage has prompted extensive scholarly investigations worldwide. Tissue engineering has emerged as a prominent approach, particularly through the utilization of artificial scaffolds that closely resemble the natural extracellular matrix (ECM). These scaffolds exhibit multi‐scale topological structures and surface physicochemical properties, which significantly influence cellular behavior, thereby attracting considerable attention from numerous researchers. This comprehensive review is concentrated on the primary techniques employed in the fabrication of biodegradable polymer scaffolds possessing oriented porous structures, and the most recent advancements in tissue engineering research are presented. Significantly, the profound influence of scaffold surface characteristics is underscored on cellular behavior, elucidating the superiority of oriented pore structures over disordered ones in mimicking the distinctive attributes of the ECM. Enhanced cell adhesion, proliferation, and tissue differentiation represent notable advantages associated with oriented porous scaffolds. Additionally, the critical interplay between scaffold structure, performance, and functionalization is emphasized, highlighting the imperative to optimize the clinical application of tissue engineering scaffolds.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oriented Porous Polymer Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of Preparation Strategies and Applications

Liu,

Wang,

Kuang

2023

Macro Materials & Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Advancements in 3D skin bioprinting: processes, bioinks, applications and sensor integration

Derman,

Rivera,

Garriga Cerda

et al. 2024

Int. J. Extrem. Manuf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This comprehensive review explores the multifaceted landscape of skin bioprinting, revolutionizing dermatological research. The applications of skin bioprinting utilizing techniques like extrusion-, droplet-, laser- and light-based methods, with specialized bioinks for skin biofabrication have been critically reviewed along with the intricate aspects of bioprinting hair follicles, sweat glands, and achieving skin pigmentation. Challenges remain with the need for vascularization, safety concerns, and the integration of automated processes for effective clinical translation. The review further investigates the incorporation of biosensor technologies, emphasizing their role in monitoring and enhancing the wound healing process. While highlighting the remarkable progress in the field, critical limitations and concerns are critically examined to provide a balanced perspective. This synthesis aims to guide scientists, engineers, and healthcare providers, fostering a deeper understanding of the current state, challenges, and future directions in skin bioprinting for transformative applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

show abstract

Modern Materials Used in the Reparative Regeneration of Bone Tissue of the Maxillofacial Region (Review)

Demyashkin,

Fidarov,

Ivanov

et al. 2024

Actual Problems in Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An urgent problem of modern implantology remains the development of means and methods for restoring the integrity of bone tissue when defects occur. An important aspect of the problem remains the validity of the choice of osteoplastic material. Despite the fairly successful use of various types of osteoplastic materials in clinical implantology for the closure of small bone defects, the treatment of large diastases remains a subject of debate and requires further search and testing of various osteoplastic materials. Aim of the study: to analyze specialized scientific literature and describe the characteristics of the most common osteoplastic materials for replacing bone tissue defects. Methodology. This literature review was based on 63 sources from the following databases: PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Medscape, Elibrary, ResearchGate, Google Scholar. Results. A description of osteoinductive materials used to replace bone defects in modern clinical practice is presented: ceramics, biocomposites based on them, corals, synthetic bones, mesenchymal stem cell cultures, 3D printing, etc. Emphasis is placed on the advantages and disadvantages of these methods. Conclusions. Based on the analysis of the literature, we can conclude that the problem of developing and introducing osteoplastic materials into clinical practice is a complex and multi-level area of joint activity of specialists in various fields. The most promising areas for further research are modifications of ceramic-based osteoplastic structures to increase their density, as well as additional cultivation of mesenchymal cells and 3D printing. However, these methods for replacing extensive bone tissue defects also need to be improved and new research conducted.

show abstract

Tissue Engineering: Intra‐Operative Bioprinting of Hard, Soft, and Hard/Soft Composite Tissues for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction (Adv. Funct. Mater. 29/2021)

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Oriented Porous Polymer Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of Preparation Strategies and Applications

Oriented Porous Polymer Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of Preparation Strategies and Applications

Advancements in 3D skin bioprinting: processes, bioinks, applications and sensor integration

Modern Materials Used in the Reparative Regeneration of Bone Tissue of the Maxillofacial Region (Review)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About