To Know Us is to Love Us: Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting in Contemporary Russia and China

Abstract

The Soft Power of Hard States, edited by Michael Barr and Valentina FeklyuninaChina and Russia have devoted significant resources to developing their international broadcasting capacity as an instrument of public diplomacy. Focusing on CCTV-N (China) and RT (Russia), this article discusses the strategies each has developed to communicate with international audiences and further the foreign policy ambitions of policy makers in Beijing and Moscow. It highlights the differences between the two stations ? namely CCTV-N's ambition to rectify perceived distortions in the global flow of news about China, and RT's focus on reporting events in the US. Hence the case studies expose the fine line between propaganda and public diplomacy.authorsversionPeer reviewe

Soft Power, Hard News: How Journalists at State-Funded Transnational Media Legitimize Their Work

“…But Nye (2004) also suggested that states may accrue "soft power" by using international media to develop a sense of "shared values" across borders (p. 7). As Rawnsley (2015) has observed, this description could easily apply to Chinese and Russian approaches to international broadcasting, which are often regarded in the West as state propaganda.…”

“…The conceptual "fuzziness" of "soft power" allowed this journalist to portray the objectives of journalists and politicians as having equal weight within a mutually beneficial relationship. Thus, the journalist's strategic deployment of "soft power" enabled him to avoid dwelling on two profoundly problematic issues: the impossibility of separating "soft" power from "hard" coercive power, and the co-structuring of the BBCWS in relation to state security and intelligence systems (Rawnsley 1996(Rawnsley , 2015.…”

Å kommunisere en konflikt – aktører i RTs dekning av situasjonen i Ukraina i februar–mars 2014

“…Det er ikke gjort noen grundige studier som vurderer i hvilken grad RT lever opp til journalistiske normer, men det virker klart at det er stort samsvar mellom offisiell russisk politisk kommunikasjon og RTs nyhetsdekning (Robertson 2015: 26Á28). Det er likevel ingen grunn til å tro at det RT presenterer er en direkte forlengelse av Kremlins politiske kommunikasjon (Rawnsley 2015). Dette er blant annet fordi 5 Ifølge Cull (2009) har offentlig diplomati tradisjonelt stått på fem pilarer: lytting, fremming av eget ståsted, kulturelt diplomati, utvekslingsdiplomati og internasjonal kringkasting.…”

Whither soft power? Divisions, milestones, and prospects of a research programme in the making

“…Firstly, the obscured distinction between soft and hard power, which harks back to the original work of Nye and which is reproduced in theory-centred research, is a recurrent cause for concern among case-centred authors (Rawnsley 2015;Stuenkel 2016;Szostek 2014;Wojciuk et al 2015). Some identify the 'practical difficulty of drawing a clear line between power that is "hard" and power that is "soft"' (Szostek 2014, p. 465) as an unresolved problem in soft-power research, leading others to concede that 'discussions about soft power are inevitably somewhat vague' (Stuenkel 2016, p. 354).…”