2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To mark or not to mark the cause, that is the question: Causal marking in Taiwanese conversation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, causal connectives may not be the first choice for Chinese speakers to indicate causality. As shown in previous studies (Chang & Su, 2012; Sah, 2015), Chinese speakers prefer using non-overtly marked causal statements over overtly marked ones in discourse. Such a discourse tendency may presumably lead to the scarce instances of causal connectives found in the present study and thus have limited our power to detect group differences for overtly marked causal statements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, causal connectives may not be the first choice for Chinese speakers to indicate causality. As shown in previous studies (Chang & Su, 2012; Sah, 2015), Chinese speakers prefer using non-overtly marked causal statements over overtly marked ones in discourse. Such a discourse tendency may presumably lead to the scarce instances of causal connectives found in the present study and thus have limited our power to detect group differences for overtly marked causal statements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Therefore, we identified overtly marked causal statements in terms of causal connectives. For instance, yin1wei4 fa1xian4 xiao3 qing1wa1 bu2jian4 le0 'because (he) realizes the little frog has gone' was coded as an overtly marked causal statement since the prototypical causal marker yin1wei4 ('because' in Mandarin Chinese) was used to introduce the account (Chang & Su, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations