2014
DOI: 10.2478/s13374-014-0218-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To trust or not to trust? Interpretations in qualitative research

Abstract: Interpretations of data in qualitative research may be biased for many reasons. This paper explores three commonly overlooked problems from a rather positivist point of view and deals with them mainly through the lens of cognitive psychology and survey methodology. The first problem is that researchers and readers of the research tend to trust retrospective data too much even though it is known that our memory is highly reconstructive. The second problem is that we often create interpretations too quickly and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this study is based on retrospective data, the interviews were conducted several times throughout one therapy to minimize memory bias. Nevertheless, it could be argued that describing therapists’ interpretations of their personal and professional development left space for constructive memory processes (Neusar, 2014). Still, this study explicitly focused on the personal interpretations to gain more detailed information on the therapists’ perspective instead of finding out how the integration process objectively unfolded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study is based on retrospective data, the interviews were conducted several times throughout one therapy to minimize memory bias. Nevertheless, it could be argued that describing therapists’ interpretations of their personal and professional development left space for constructive memory processes (Neusar, 2014). Still, this study explicitly focused on the personal interpretations to gain more detailed information on the therapists’ perspective instead of finding out how the integration process objectively unfolded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative and mixed method approaches are less popular. This is because the qualitative approach is considered less objective and often biased so that sometimes it cannot be used to generalize a phenomenon (65). In a qualitative approach to collecting data is usually taken from a homogeneous sample through interviews (63).…”
Section: Popular Methods In Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other data collection instruments that we used are semi-structured interviews, review of organizational documentation, and observations. Qualitative researchers frequently use interviews as a primary source of data because it is a natural approach to the inquiry and serve as one of the most important sources of evidence in a case study [17,23,24]. We interviewed participants by using a semistructured interview protocol with open-ended questions (see Appendix A).…”
Section: Data Collection Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%