2010
DOI: 10.1177/1329878x1013500116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Too Much? Too Young? The Sexualisation of Children Debate in Australia

Abstract: This article considers the origins and focus of current Australian debates around the alleged ‘sexualisation’ of children and young people. It explores the popular discourses around youth and sexuality and unpacks the assumptions and contradictions that underwrite them, by addressing the terms of reference of the Australian Senate's 2008 Sexualisation of Children in the Contemporary Media Inquiry. The article concludes by outlining some proposed public policy solutions to addressing current community concerns … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So too did a succession of policy papers and government and institutional reports published in the UK, USA and Australia secure the ‘sexualization’ of girls as a pressing social problem (Egan, 2013). Amongst these, the Australia Institute Report, provocatively titled Corporate Paedophilia (Rush and La Nauze, 2006), and the American Psychological Society Task Force Report on the Sexualization of Girls (APA, 2007) exerted a particularly strong influence in highlighting the ‘sexualization’ of girls as a ‘crisis’ requiring swift educational and political intervention (Duschinsky, 2013; Lumby and Albury, 2010). Collectively, this body of literature has both underlined the problematic of ‘sexualized’ representations of women and girls in the media and, perhaps unwittingly, cast girls as the naïve and damaged victims of ‘sexualization’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So too did a succession of policy papers and government and institutional reports published in the UK, USA and Australia secure the ‘sexualization’ of girls as a pressing social problem (Egan, 2013). Amongst these, the Australia Institute Report, provocatively titled Corporate Paedophilia (Rush and La Nauze, 2006), and the American Psychological Society Task Force Report on the Sexualization of Girls (APA, 2007) exerted a particularly strong influence in highlighting the ‘sexualization’ of girls as a ‘crisis’ requiring swift educational and political intervention (Duschinsky, 2013; Lumby and Albury, 2010). Collectively, this body of literature has both underlined the problematic of ‘sexualized’ representations of women and girls in the media and, perhaps unwittingly, cast girls as the naïve and damaged victims of ‘sexualization’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tethered to broader critiques of the term ‘sexualization’ itself (e.g. its elastic and labile meanings; Gill, 2012; Lumby and Albury, 2010), scholars have underscored the limitations of a psychologizing gaze and media-effects model (e.g. Gill, 2012), erasures of girls’ agency (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tankard Reist, 2009b: 33) and those who challenge them (e.g. Lumby and Albury, 2010: 145–146) disagree about the size and significance of public concern about sexualisation these well-attended public meetings suggest that, if not a movement, there is certainly a popular (and socially well-connected) constituency available to be mobilised. These meetings are a current phenomenon at the time of writing but it is the three public meetings that I attended in the city of Adelaide, South Australia, held between October 2009 and May 2010, that are the beginning point of my analysis here of the media sexualisation discourse as it manifests in Australia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Childhood innocence' has continued unabated to define the child and its place in the world today. In fact, any challenge to the sacrosanct concept of childhood innocence generally leads to a heightened level of concern in society (see critiques by Renold, 2005;Blaise, 2010;Egan & Hawkes, 2010;Lumby & Albury, 2010;Taylor, 2010;Renold & Ringrose, 2011;Egan, 2013).…”
Section: Children's Knowledge Sexual Subjectivity and Sexual Citizenmentioning
confidence: 97%