2005
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology of small-world networks of protein-protein complex structures

Abstract: http://www.fujirebio.co.jp/support/index.php (under construction).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common features of these networks appear as for example the small-world structure found in various fields of application like peer-to-peer networks (Latapy and Magnien 2008), lexical network (Gaume 2004), networks between firm directors (Davis et. al 2003) or protein networks (del Sol et al, 2004). The characteristic of a small-world are that the average distance between two nodes of the network is low (also known as tight global connectivity) and secondly that the probability of existence of an edge between two nodes is higher if these two nodes are linked to a third one (we also say that the network has a strong local connectivity) (Watts, 2003).…”
Section: Analyzing a Dense Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common features of these networks appear as for example the small-world structure found in various fields of application like peer-to-peer networks (Latapy and Magnien 2008), lexical network (Gaume 2004), networks between firm directors (Davis et. al 2003) or protein networks (del Sol et al, 2004). The characteristic of a small-world are that the average distance between two nodes of the network is low (also known as tight global connectivity) and secondly that the probability of existence of an edge between two nodes is higher if these two nodes are linked to a third one (we also say that the network has a strong local connectivity) (Watts, 2003).…”
Section: Analyzing a Dense Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the scoring terms are designed to differentiate the two incorrect docking structures from the correct docking results (see methods). By analyzing the co-crystallized structures, previous researches [14,24,25] found that the centrally conserved residues or hot spot residues are key in preserving characteristic path lengths of protein complexes. However, by comparing correct docking complexes with those incorrect ones, our research shows that the correct binding complexes have lower characteristic path lengths and better connectivities of the complex network than the incorrect ones.…”
Section: Analysis Of Residue Network Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some academic studies found that the protein contact networks are small world [13][14][15][16][17], which have large values of the clustering coefficient and small values of the characteristic path length. Some application studies have focused on monomer proteins, such as the prediction of key residues in protein folding [13,18] or identification of functional residues in protein structures [19], the correlation between the residue fluctuations and the average shortest path lengths [20] and the mechanisms of protein folding [21][22][23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of these indices, betweenness has been extensively used in recent years for the analysis of social-interaction networks, as well as other large-scale complex networks. Some applications include lethality in biological networks [5,6,7], study of sexual networks and AIDS [8], identifying key actors in terrorist networks [9,10], organizational behavior [11], and supply chain management processes [12]. Betweenness is also used as the primary routine in popular algorithms for clustering and community identification [13] in real-world networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%