2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0022389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture.

Abstract: We review recent developments in the study of culture and personality measurement. Three approaches are described: an

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
343
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(365 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
10
343
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of this field can be divided into three phases, which are also major objectives of the area (Cheung et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2013). The first is the etic imposition and concerns the investigation of the generality and validity of models and theories developed in WEIRD countries in other cultural contexts.…”
Section: The Lexical Approach and Cross-cultural Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of this field can be divided into three phases, which are also major objectives of the area (Cheung et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2013). The first is the etic imposition and concerns the investigation of the generality and validity of models and theories developed in WEIRD countries in other cultural contexts.…”
Section: The Lexical Approach and Cross-cultural Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is that the taxonomic models of personality traits were substantially derived from the lexicon of the English language and the replicability of the models in other cultures was verified mostly by translation, adaptation and collection of evidence of validity and reliability in other languages and cultures. This perspective, named etic approach, denotes an universalist perspective concerned with the replicability of hypothetically universal personality models in different cultural contexts (Allik, Massoudi, Realo, & Rossier, 2012;Cheung, Van de Vijver, & Leong, 2011;Church, 2008;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blind spots left by this approach are often emphasized by indigenous and cultural psychologists (Cheung, Cheung, Wada, & Zhang, 2006). The importance of incorporating indigenous and universal, or emic and etic, elements in the study and assessment of psychological constructs, and personality in particular, has been increasingly recognized over the past decades (Cheung, Van de Vijver, & Leong, 2011;Van de Vijver, 2013). Yet, little work has been done on combining emic and etic elements in personality research and assessment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "etic" thereby denotes explorations "as from outside of a particular system" (Cheung, van de Vijver & Leong 2011;Church 2001). An example is the use of translated versions of standardised Five Factor Model inventories to study individuals in national and cultural communities other than those of the Anglo-American communities for which this model and its inventories were originally developed (e.g., Terracciano et al, 2005).…”
Section: D) Etic (Or Top-down) Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes researchers combine elements of different classes of approaches in their selection procedures (Cheung et al 2011). For example, from the four major categories of person-descriptive terms that Allport and Odbert (1936) derived with a lexical physical system approach, Cattell (1943) used the terms from the first category and added about 100 temporary-state terms that he nominated himself, thus using a nomination approach.…”
Section: E) Mixed Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%