The psychological component of immigration in the Netherlands was studied by comparing views on multiculturalism and acculturation orientation of Turkish migrants between Dutch majority (N ¼ 1565) and Turkish-Dutch minority (N ¼ 185) members. Multiculturalism was measured with an adaptation of the Multicultural Ideology Scale (Berry & Kalin, 1995); acculturation orientation was investigated in different domains of life. The results revealed that Dutch on average had a neutral attitude towards multiculturalism in the Netherlands while Turkish-Dutch showed a more positive attitude. Regarding the acculturation strategies, Dutch adults preferred assimilation above integration of Turkish migrants in all life domains. Turkish-Dutch adults made a distinction in public and private domains: integration was preferred in public domains, and separation in private domains. In public domains both cultural groups agreed that Turkish migrants should adapt to the Dutch culture. In private domains there was no agreement at all in the views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. These results suggest that the views on acculturation and multiculturalism differ substantially for majority and minority group members. Implications are discussed. Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Due to increased international migration during the last decades, the population of several Western European societies, including the Netherlands, has become culturally diverse. Interest in the possibilities and concerns of immigration, especially its effects on immigrants and its implications for the receiving society, has stimulated research in the social sciences. Two complementary domains in psychology explicitly address this field: acculturation and intergroup relations (Berry, 2001). Acculturation research in cross-cultural psychology has focused mainly on changes and continuities in cultural orientation of immigrants 1 following migration, while research on intergroup relations in social psychology has been largely concerned with studying the attitudes of majority people toward migrant groups. Although the outcomes of the acculturation process and the intergroup relations depend substantially on mutual expectations and interactions between the members of the majority and the migrant groups, very few studies have systematically compared their mutual views thus far The terms immigrants, minorities, minority and immigrant groups refer to people with a lower power (numerical, economic, and political), while dominant, majority, and native groups refer to people with the higher power in the society.
General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.