2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an accessible and robust in vitro approach to evaluate bacterial viability in the upper gastro-intestinal tract: A Gastro-Intestinal Digestive Simulator (GIDS) combined with alternative methods to plating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also not possible to establish the respective contribution of each strain of the Test product in the observed effects which can be only considered to be borne by the mix of ferments and their metabolites. However, yogurt strains cannot survive to upper GI tract conditions as shown in a semi-dynamic in vitro model 52 , whereas L. casei CNCM-1518 survival in the gut was previously reported in human after consumption in a fermented milk 63 . Also, the three probiotics candidates are more likely major contributors considering their respective effects as demonstrated in former studies as previously described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also not possible to establish the respective contribution of each strain of the Test product in the observed effects which can be only considered to be borne by the mix of ferments and their metabolites. However, yogurt strains cannot survive to upper GI tract conditions as shown in a semi-dynamic in vitro model 52 , whereas L. casei CNCM-1518 survival in the gut was previously reported in human after consumption in a fermented milk 63 . Also, the three probiotics candidates are more likely major contributors considering their respective effects as demonstrated in former studies as previously described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We used shotgun metagenomics to assess the extent of the functional contribution of Test product strains within the microbiome. We focused on the three probiotic candidates, as yogurt strains were previously shown not to survive in an in vitro Gastro-Intestinal Digestive Simulator 52 . 5,452 non-redundant genes (95% similarity) were identified for the three strains, corresponding to 2,176 bacterial (KEGG) ortholog groups (KOs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strains of S. thermophilus are used as starter cultures in classic yogurt fermentations and are commonly detected in fecal samples from yogurt consumers, 32 but show poor survival for upper GI tract conditions. 33 Interestingly, in an alternate study that tested the same milk product without Hp therapy in healthy people, the replication rates of the same S. thermophilus strains were much lower in the gut microbiome although the daily doses of the strains administered were higher. 25 This suggests that Hp therapy enhances the ability of yogurt starters to survive in the gut, possibly directly through a lowering of gastric pH through the PPI therapy 34 , 35 or indirectly by lowering colonization resistance induced by the antibiotic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%