2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b02626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Supertough and Heat-Resistant Stereocomplex-Type Polylactide/Elastomer Blends with Impressive Melt Stability via in Situ Formation of Graft Copolymer during One-Pot Reactive Melt Blending

Abstract: Stereocomplexation of enantiomeric poly­(l-lactide)/poly­(d-lactide) (PLLA/PDLA) chains opens up a great opportunity toward sustainable PLA engineering plastic with exceptional heat resistance and durability. However, the processing and applications of stereocomplex-type PLA (SC-PLA) are significantly blocked by its inferior melt stability (i.e., the weak melt memory effect in triggering complete SC crystallization, which makes it hard to obtain exclusive formation of SC crystallites in melt-processed products… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, this change in a biodegradable polymer can result in an increase in thermal stability, mechanical strength, resistance against solvent penetration, and external forces. Stereocomplex crystals in PLA have commonly been formed by solution blending, melt blending, emulsion blending, precipitation into non-solvent, and supercritical fluid (SCF) techniques [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Each method has different advantages and disadvantages regarding the yield and stereocomplexation efficiency, processability, solubility, time, and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, this change in a biodegradable polymer can result in an increase in thermal stability, mechanical strength, resistance against solvent penetration, and external forces. Stereocomplex crystals in PLA have commonly been formed by solution blending, melt blending, emulsion blending, precipitation into non-solvent, and supercritical fluid (SCF) techniques [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Each method has different advantages and disadvantages regarding the yield and stereocomplexation efficiency, processability, solubility, time, and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13–16 ] Using rubber particles to toughen PLLA has proved to be a simple and economical method. [ 17–20 ] But the serious problem of poor interfacial interaction between rubber and PLLA is ubiquitous in this method, which would lead to a rather low toughening efficiency. [ 21–23 ] Compared with the complex interfacial modification methods of reactive compatibilizing or synthesizing copolymer compatibilizers, in recent years, toughening PLLA with core‐shell rubber nanoparticles has attracted much more attention due to their good interfacial modification effect, low cost, and easy industrialized production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various strategies have been developed to prepare ductile PLLA. As a typical example, it has been blended with flexible polymers [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. In these multicomponent blend systems, phase separation always occurs due to the poor miscibility of them [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%