IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2018
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2018.8517991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Generalized Method for Tree Species Classification Using Multispectral Airborne Laser Scanning in Ontario, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scanning configuration of LiDAR survey can be summarized as follows: pulse repetition frequency = 375kHz, scan frequency = 40 Hz, scan angle = ±20 • , and flying height ≈ 1, 100 m. As a result, the mean point density of channel 1 to 3 is ,respectively, 11.9 points/m 2 , 12.4 points/m 2 , and 4.8 points/m 2 , yielding to an approximate 0.5 m of mean point spacing. Although a total of 33 LiDAR data strips were intentionally collected to study forest attribute modelling (van Ewijk et al, 2019) and tree species classification (Rana et al, 2018), we selected two pairs of LiDAR data strips, with an approximate 55% of overlapping in each, to study the intensity variation before and after implementing the proposed range normalization.…”
Section: Multispectral Lidar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scanning configuration of LiDAR survey can be summarized as follows: pulse repetition frequency = 375kHz, scan frequency = 40 Hz, scan angle = ±20 • , and flying height ≈ 1, 100 m. As a result, the mean point density of channel 1 to 3 is ,respectively, 11.9 points/m 2 , 12.4 points/m 2 , and 4.8 points/m 2 , yielding to an approximate 0.5 m of mean point spacing. Although a total of 33 LiDAR data strips were intentionally collected to study forest attribute modelling (van Ewijk et al, 2019) and tree species classification (Rana et al, 2018), we selected two pairs of LiDAR data strips, with an approximate 55% of overlapping in each, to study the intensity variation before and after implementing the proposed range normalization.…”
Section: Multispectral Lidar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest segmentation can be done through two different techniques: (1) point cloud-based and (2) raster-based, using the canopy height model (CHM) [8,15,16]. The first technique generally gives good results, but it is time-consuming, complex and requires advanced LiDAR sensors [17]. The second technique has been studied much more, both at the stand level [18,19] and at the tree level [20][21][22], as there are a variety of algorithms that provide rapid ITC segmentation, which gives satisfactory results [14,16,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%