2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a ‘New Project Management’ movement? An international development perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This creates connections with the project stakeholder theory [86]. However, the review of [78] was conducted through the lens of the rethinking project management school [94], which continually challenges the linear concept of project management processes in general use by many practitioners [95,96]. According to [97], some practitioners eschew such approaches and prefer to use more traditional processes and tools to deliver sustainable projects.…”
Section: Project Management For Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates connections with the project stakeholder theory [86]. However, the review of [78] was conducted through the lens of the rethinking project management school [94], which continually challenges the linear concept of project management processes in general use by many practitioners [95,96]. According to [97], some practitioners eschew such approaches and prefer to use more traditional processes and tools to deliver sustainable projects.…”
Section: Project Management For Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisational support and synchronised individual behaviours are required to achieve successful projects to receive optimised performance and investments (Eve, 2007), with the improved alignment of knowledge and requirements to better cope with the diversity and complexity associated with project management (Bresnen, 2016). Picciotto (2020) agrees and calls for a new project management approach with a more flexible assessment methodology covering complex agriculture projects and organisations undertaken by ACIs.…”
Section: Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change led to a modification in the results of the report, from a success rate of 27-31% to 36-41% [2]. "In any sector, a project ought not to be rated successful unless it achieves its relevant objectives efficiently, in a sustainable fashion and with positive impacts, including side effects" [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%