2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an instant structure-property prediction quality control tool for additive manufactured steel using a crystal plasticity trained deep learning surrogate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Structure-property models are usually developed to capture the microstructure-sensitivity of PBF-LB material. 24,25 Specifically, full-field crystal plasticity (CP) model, for example, CP finite element [26][27][28] and CP fast Fourier transform [29][30][31] models, are widely used to predict mechanical properties based on inherited microstructure, for example, from the PBF-LB process. However, the visible intragranular and intergranular mechanical fields from full-field CP also results in very high computational overhead and again, for a typically small-scale representative volume element of simulated material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Structure-property models are usually developed to capture the microstructure-sensitivity of PBF-LB material. 24,25 Specifically, full-field crystal plasticity (CP) model, for example, CP finite element [26][27][28] and CP fast Fourier transform [29][30][31] models, are widely used to predict mechanical properties based on inherited microstructure, for example, from the PBF-LB process. However, the visible intragranular and intergranular mechanical fields from full-field CP also results in very high computational overhead and again, for a typically small-scale representative volume element of simulated material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure depicts the multimodal deep-learning CNN framework proposed herein. CNN was utilized as it has been demonstrated to be successful for image feature extraction and the labor-intensive process of feature engineering. , Compared to the single input of CNN utilized in most of the previous studies, a multimodal input comprising the morphology (SEM image), composition (EDX image), and time data of the laser-textured surface was generated. As shown in Figure , the morphology and composition are coupled by overlapping; thus, six-channel coupling images are obtained.…”
Section: Multimodal Cnn Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing deep learning methods for material data analysis has demonstrated higher accuracy in predicting material mechanical responses than traditional machine learning methods, including support vector machines (SVM), decision trees, and back propagation (BP) neural networks, effectively reducing the computational and simulation time required to obtain material properties. In addition, Tu et al [12] . employed crystal plasticity finite element (CPFE) simulation results as a dataset to develop deep neural networks (DNN) and establish the relationships between different microstructures and strengths in stainless steels or multiphase materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%