Towards Developing a Prescriptive Technology of Counselor Supervision

Holloway, Elizabeth L.; Hosford, Ray E.

doi:10.1177/0011000083111012

Cited by 64 publications

(65 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These authors recommended that scientific investigation of supervision should proceed through a series of phases, the first of which is to describe the supervision process in its natural environment. The development of an observation system for describing verbal problem-solving behavior occurring during group supervision, described herein, is consistent with Holloway and Hosford's ( 1983) recommendation. The importance of studying the problem-solving process is underscored by the recommendations that problem solving be used as a heuristic guide to delivering psychological services (Comtois & Clark, 1976) and other related services, such as special education (Maher & Bennett, 1984).…”

supporting

confidence: 54%

A Behavior Observation System for Group Supervision

Kruger

Cherniss

Maher

et al. 1988

Couns Edu & Supervision

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A behavior observation system was developed for group supervision. The observation system was designed to measure the occurrence of verbal problem‐solving behavior during group supervision meetings. Reliability data were obtained from four counseling teams' group supervision meetings at a residential facility for youngsters with social and emotional problems. Interrater agreement based on occurrences of verbal behavior indicated that the observation system has adequate reliability for preliminary research. Possible directions for research with the observation system are delineated.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 54%

A Behavior Observation System for Group Supervision

Kruger

Cherniss

Maher

et al. 1988

Couns Edu & Supervision

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Concerns have been raised about the conceptual foundations of supervision research, and it has been proposed that discovery-oriented, exploratory, and descriptive research procedures should be the central focus of supervision research at this stage (Bernard & Goodyear, 1992;Holloway & Hosford, 1983). Borders (1989) called for a pragmatic agenda for supervision research, claiming that global selfreport measures do not answer questions about the actual conduct of effective supervision that are relevant to practitioners.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Correspondence between supervisors and trainees in their perception of supervision events

Reichelt

Skjerve

2001

J Clin Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The focus of this study is on how the participants in 16 supervisory dyads perceive the content and process in a supervisory session, and on the meaning they attach to supervisory events. A central issue is to what degree the participants in each dyad correspond in their perceptions and evaluation of supervisory events. Another question is how lack of correspondence affects the trainees' experience of satisfaction with the supervision. A majority of the dyads were rated low or moderate in correspondence, and it is discussed whether the influence of low correspondence on trainee satisfaction may be related to supervisory intentions and style characteristics. A main point in the discussion is whether role ambiguity may be related to obscure communication and reduced correspondence, and it is suggested that more attention should be paid to negotiating and renegotiating rules for the supervisory relationship.

show abstract

“…Wliile supewisee growth and change are clearly important goals, it is the lherapeutic interaction wilh a genuine client that clearly differentiates supervision from counseling skills training (Holloway & Hosford, 1983). Clienl progress can reliably signal trainee effecliveness.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%