2017
DOI: 10.1108/jpbafm-29-04-2017-b001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards enhancing tax abatement transparency: Reviewing the promises and limitations of GASB 77

Abstract: In August 2015, the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) adopted Statement 77, requiring government disclosure in audited financial reports of a particular type of tax expenditure, tax abatements. GASB's reporting standards move tax abatements from a budgetary environment to an accounting environment. This paper evaluates GASB 77's provisions to encourage an early and on-going dialogue about the Statement's prospects for achieving greater transparency compared to existing tax expenditure reporting effo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither captured in revenue and expenditure statements nor subject to disclosure requirements (unless so specified in state statutes), local tax expenditures were a hidden cost prior to the existence of Statement No. 77 (Propheter, 2017). While all but four state governments (Missouri, North Dakota, Utah, and Virginia) issue tax expenditure reports on a regular basis, Montgomery County, Maryland, is the only local jurisdiction known to do so.…”
Section: Measurement and Data For Solving "Wicked" Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither captured in revenue and expenditure statements nor subject to disclosure requirements (unless so specified in state statutes), local tax expenditures were a hidden cost prior to the existence of Statement No. 77 (Propheter, 2017). While all but four state governments (Missouri, North Dakota, Utah, and Virginia) issue tax expenditure reports on a regular basis, Montgomery County, Maryland, is the only local jurisdiction known to do so.…”
Section: Measurement and Data For Solving "Wicked" Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies consider the PAFR as public accountability tool that illustrates the activities of the municipality with simplicity and transparency, facilitating the communication paths between government and citizens (Biancone et al, 2019; Jordan et al, 2017; Manes‐Rossi et al, 2019; Propheter, 2017). In this regard, it is possible to observe how the quality and quantity of information disclosed by the municipality are strictly connected to the size of the population served (Alcaraz‐Quiles et al, 2014).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%