2014 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2014.7046987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards high-performance two-dimensional black phosphorus optoelectronic devices: the role of metal contacts

Abstract: The metal contacts on 2D black phosphorus field-effect transistor and photodetectors are studied. The metal work functions can significantly impact the Schottky barrier at the metal-semiconductor contact in black phosphorus devices. Higher metal work functions lead to larger output hole currents in p-type transistors, while ambipolar characteristics can be observed with lower work function metals. Photodetectors with record high photoresponsivity (223 mA/W) are demonstrated on black phosphorus through contact-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing rate (Δ I ph /Δ t ) of photocurrent is caused by the increase of carrier concentration and the existence of built‐in electric field related to the efficient charge transfer between BP and MoS 2 NPs. The responsivities, detectivities, and response times of the present MoS 2 NP–BP devices demonstrated obvious improvements over previous results for BP and BP junction photodevices . However, as the use of MoS 2 NPs as a light absorption layer in MIR range would be limited due to the large bandgap (>1.8 eV), the integration of BP with smaller bandgap semiconductor or metal NPs need to be further studied for performance improvements in MIR range compared to the reported BP photodetectors …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increasing rate (Δ I ph /Δ t ) of photocurrent is caused by the increase of carrier concentration and the existence of built‐in electric field related to the efficient charge transfer between BP and MoS 2 NPs. The responsivities, detectivities, and response times of the present MoS 2 NP–BP devices demonstrated obvious improvements over previous results for BP and BP junction photodevices . However, as the use of MoS 2 NPs as a light absorption layer in MIR range would be limited due to the large bandgap (>1.8 eV), the integration of BP with smaller bandgap semiconductor or metal NPs need to be further studied for performance improvements in MIR range compared to the reported BP photodetectors …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The highest responsivities observed for this hybrid structure were 5000 A W −1 in the visible light range and 309 A W −1 in the near‐infrared range. These values are higher than those of reported BP and 2D BP–MoS 2 vertical photodiode photodetectors . These high values in MoS 2 NP–BP structure arise from the strong light absorption and p‐doping effect by charge transfer behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 31 ] As an anisotropic material, the transport property of BP is highly dependent on the crystal orientation, [ 47 ] the channel of the BP device in Figure 3 c,d is along zigzag direction, which is identifi ed by angle-resolved polarized Raman spectroscopy (ARPRS) ( Figure S7 in the Supporting Information). [ 48 ] As reported, [ 23,24,28,30,49 ] electron current of BP FETs is much lower than that of holes, which can be attributed to a large Schottky barrier height for electron injection. [ 23 ] Interestingly, the electron current of Sedoped BP FET levels up compared to that of the pristine one ( Figure S8, Supporting Information), indicating more electrons transporting between BP channel and metal electrodes with reduced Shottky barrier after Se dope.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Investigating the detection of visible and UV light by semiconducting 2DMs has led to a proliferation ofphotodetectors with responsivity spanning approximately 15 orders of magnitude (see Fig. 2a-d) across a wide variety of materials systems, including graphene [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) [39,40]; black phosphorous [41][42][43][44]; III-VI layered compounds (GaX [45][46][47][48][49][50], InX [51][52][53][54], In 2 X 3 [55]); TMDs (MoS 2 [41,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65], ReS 2 [66] , WX 2 [64,[67][68][69][70]); and post-TMDs (SnS 2 [71][72][73]); Bi 2 Te 3 [74]. From this vast and everincreasing amount of data, there are several key points that emerge:…”
Section: Visible and Ultravioletmentioning
confidence: 99%