1993
DOI: 10.1016/0954-349x(93)90012-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards literature-based innovation output indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional measures of R&D intensity and patent counts were widely recognized as inadequate, reflecting only the input side of the innovation process. Several approaches were proposed: counting innovations that are mentioned in the 'product news' columns of trade journals (Kleinknecht & Reijnen, 1993;and Santarelli & Piergiovanni, 1996); calculating the number of years a patent is renewed and the number of countries in which protection for the same invention is sought (Lanjouw et al, 1998); detailed analysis of knowledge formation and technical development (Laestadius, 1998); composite measures using R&D, patent and educational data (Jacobsson et al, 1996) or factor analysis depicting the technical (input side) and the market dimension (output side) for both product and process innovations (Hollenstein, 1996); and using multiple indices to represent both technological dynamics and structural change, including intrinsic and environmental qualities of a process; rate of renewal, relevance of R & D; product quality and degree of diversification;…”
Section: G Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional measures of R&D intensity and patent counts were widely recognized as inadequate, reflecting only the input side of the innovation process. Several approaches were proposed: counting innovations that are mentioned in the 'product news' columns of trade journals (Kleinknecht & Reijnen, 1993;and Santarelli & Piergiovanni, 1996); calculating the number of years a patent is renewed and the number of countries in which protection for the same invention is sought (Lanjouw et al, 1998); detailed analysis of knowledge formation and technical development (Laestadius, 1998); composite measures using R&D, patent and educational data (Jacobsson et al, 1996) or factor analysis depicting the technical (input side) and the market dimension (output side) for both product and process innovations (Hollenstein, 1996); and using multiple indices to represent both technological dynamics and structural change, including intrinsic and environmental qualities of a process; rate of renewal, relevance of R & D; product quality and degree of diversification;…”
Section: G Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicator type is usually used to measure the degree of radicalness of innovations. However, LBIOs do not capture in-house process innovations and the measure can be inflated for some technologies which might help firm profits to improve by signaling innovativeness (Coombs 1996) or if other diverging incentives for firms to publish product innovations exist (Kleinknecht and Reijnen 1993). In addition, Acs, Anselin, and Varga (2002) indicate that…”
Section: Shortcomings Of Established Inovation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is only a handful or papers that study utility models (Shangai Patent Agency, 1990;KleinKnecht and Reijnen, 1993;Beneito, 2006). Arguments support the direct positive effect of grants on utility models if their aim is to promote incremental innovation (Milesi et al, 2013), but negative if the goal is to foster radical innovation (Li, 2009).…”
Section: The Effect Of Public Funding On Utility Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%