2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Process-based Range Modeling of Many Species

Abstract: Understanding and forecasting species' geographic distributions in the face of global change is a central priority in biodiversity science. The existing view is that one must choose between correlative models for many species versus process-based models for few species. We suggest that opportunities exist to produce process-based range models for many species, by using hierarchical and inverse modeling to borrow strength across species, fill data gaps, fuse diverse data sets, and model across biological and sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
148
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
3
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hierarchical modelling frameworks are a promising avenue to address this challenge in species distribution modelling, in which the scale of interactions between environment and organisms determines the type of data fed into the models (Diez & Pulliam ; Evans et al . ). With this study we promote the capabilities of matrix population modelling in examining predictions of correlative SDMs and more broadly, demography–environment relationships, while we admit that there is much room for further improvement of both SDMs and MPMs in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hierarchical modelling frameworks are a promising avenue to address this challenge in species distribution modelling, in which the scale of interactions between environment and organisms determines the type of data fed into the models (Diez & Pulliam ; Evans et al . ). With this study we promote the capabilities of matrix population modelling in examining predictions of correlative SDMs and more broadly, demography–environment relationships, while we admit that there is much room for further improvement of both SDMs and MPMs in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hence, should a single environmental variable change, diversity in the relevant trait should decrease, but with little effect on other traits. This would allow testing for more complex relationships between traits and niche characteristics and would facilitate the development of process-based SDMs for many species (Evans et al, 2016). Our approach, linking traits and demographically derived niches, is complementary to the recent development of physiological niche models that predict range dynamics (e.g., Higgins et al, 2012;Kearney & Porter, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The niche concept is also frequently invoked as the basis for species distribution modelling and to understand the shifts of species ranges under environmental change (Ehrlén & Morris, 2015;Guisan & Thuiller, 2005). Despite the central role of Hutchinson's niche framework for theoretical and applied ecology, our understanding of what determines interspecific variation in Hutchinsonian niches remains limited (Evans, Merow, Record, McMahon, & Enquist, 2016;Holt, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Evans et al. ). For example, one might determine experimentally the effect of temperature on development of a trait whose values determine one or more demographic rates in the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanistic (or process‐based) distribution models attempt to formulate the niche in terms of the causal effects of climate and other environmental factors on functional traits that affect demography and therefore distribution (Kearney and Porter , Evans et al. ). “Forward” models are developed by empirical parameterization of the underlying process rather than by calibration against distribution data (Chapman et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%