2010 Second International Conference on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/dbkda.2010.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Social Network Extraction Using a Graph Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response, hierarchical data models were proposed. In a similar way, new requirements also triggered the need for general graph support in large-scale databases; main drivers here have been ontologies requiring comparatively small, heterogeneous graphs [49] and social networks with their large, homogeneous graphs [105]. A further relevant data structure is comprised by multi-dimensional arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response, hierarchical data models were proposed. In a similar way, new requirements also triggered the need for general graph support in large-scale databases; main drivers here have been ontologies requiring comparatively small, heterogeneous graphs [49] and social networks with their large, homogeneous graphs [105]. A further relevant data structure is comprised by multi-dimensional arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in power-inspection route planning [1,2], all task points and equipment can be regarded as nodes in the graph, and path length between each task point or equipment can be regarded as an edge; thereby, a road graph on power inspection is formed. In another example, an entire social network [3][4][5] is a graph in which the user is the vertex of the graph, and the relationship between the user and another user is regarded as the edge. As can be seen from the above examples, as a storage or presentation form in a specific application, how to mine the knowledge contained in a graph by quickly traversing the vertices in the graph is a research hotspot in the field of graphics computing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantages of this transformation are (1) to discover underlying graphs of objects from relational databases, taking into account the implicit relations expressed by the means of primary and foreign keys and (2) to model data in a more flexible way (objects can easily be added or removed in a graph). The reader interested by details about this approach can refer to [25]. The resulting hypernode database schema -h denotes the name of H, -N h denotes a set of nodes N h := {n h |n h := n, t } where n is the node name, t is the type.…”
Section: Graph Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our process to transform the relational database into a hypernode database [25], we have defined four types of relations: IS-A, Part-of, dependency with known name (using the initial relational tables containing only foreign keys), dependency with unknown name.…”
Section: Graph Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%